Laserfiche WebLink
REMEDIATION TESTING AND DESIGN July 1, 1993 <br /> Vacuum Extraction Feasibility Testing <br /> A limited vapor extraction feasibility test was conducted utilizing <br /> vapor probe P-2 as the extraction point . Prior to conducting the <br /> test, an air discharge notification letter was sent to the San Joaquin <br /> Valley Air Pollution Control District . A copy of the regulatory <br /> correspondence is contained in Appendix A. Probe P-2 was extracted <br /> from for a period of 20-minutes . Vacuum extraction was conducted <br /> using the RTD vacuum extraction testing unit (VETU) consisting of : a <br /> Sutorbilt Model 3ML positive displacement blower capable of displacing <br /> 100 standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) at a vacuum of 15 inches of <br /> mercury ( "Hg) directly driven by a Kohler 12-horsepower gasoline <br /> engine; a 55-gallon water knock-out device and; two drums in series, <br /> each containing 175-pounds of vapor phase activated carbon. <br /> A clear, flexible PVC vacuum hose was connected from inlet port of the <br /> VETU to an airtight fitting at P-2 . Standard vacuum extraction was <br /> conducted for a period of 20-minutes . <br /> RESULTS <br /> Soil Gas Screening <br /> Results of the SGS are presented in Table 1 . FID field screening at <br /> all probe locations showed no detectable hydrocarbons . Generally, the <br /> probes exhibited moderate to good sample flow characteristics, with an <br /> average sample flow rate through the sample pump of 13 standard cubic <br /> feet per hour (scfh) , with an average vacuum of 9 inches of mercury <br /> ( "Hg) . <br /> Probe installation difficulties were encountered beyond approximately <br /> 12-feet . Beyond that depth, the probes went down very slowly. Probes <br /> P-3-deep and P-10 could not be driven beyond the 15-feet depth <br /> interval due to inpenetrable soil conditions encountered at these <br /> locations . All probes were very difficult to remove . Probes P-10 and <br /> P-12 could not be removed. These two probes were pounded 1-inch below <br /> grade and filled with a neat portland cement slurry to grade . <br /> Vacuum Extraction Feasibility Testing <br /> Table 2 contains VEFT field data for extraction screening from probe <br /> P-2 located at the east end of the UST area. The results of this test <br /> exhibited that there was no flow from the probe and that a maximum <br /> vacuum of 22 . 0 "Hg was recorded. Probe P-2 was originally thought to <br /> be located in the UST backfill material , but based on VEFT results <br /> (not characteristic for higher permeability backfill material) was <br /> probably located in the less permeable native soils . Based on the <br /> poor flow rate and high vacuum, influence at the surrounding probes <br /> was not recorded during the VEFT. <br /> 2 - <br />