Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> 1 <br /> 10 February 2006 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 02-0977 <br /> Page 11 of 12 <br /> 5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based upon data collected during the fourth quarter 2005, AGE recommends <br /> • Continued utilization of wells MW-1 through MW-8 for quarterly ground water monitoring <br /> and sampling, the 1' quarter 2006 ground water monitoring event has tentatively been <br /> I scheduled for 22 March 2006 <br /> • In accordance with the SJCEHD directive letter dated 12 August 2005 for performance of two <br /> (2), separate batch removal events,the second of two ground water batch removal event was <br /> performed at well MW-2 between 23 and 27 January 2006, a report of findings is <br /> forthcoming <br />' • Soil and ground water data indicate that vapor phase migration may be occurring from the soil <br /> to the shallow ground water table Utilizing SVE wells VW-1 through VW-4, AGE <br /> recommends performance of an eight-hour SVE pilot study to evaluate SVE as a remedial <br />' alternative,the results of the SVE pilot test should provide data to calculate an effective SVE <br /> radius of influence for design of an interim SVE remediation system <br /> . An interim ground water remediation program should be implemented at the site as soon as <br /> possible to establish hydraulic controls and to inhibit further off-site migration of the <br /> MTBE-ground water plume AGE had previously proposed installation of a ground water <br /> I extraction well in the November 2004 Site Assessment Work Plan At a minimum, AGE <br /> recommends the installation of a ground water extraction well near well MW-2, <br /> implementation of an interim ground water extraction (pump-and-trat) remediation system <br /> utilizing carbon-based treatment with discharge into the City of Lodi sewer system, to <br /> mitigate the off-site migration of the dissolved MTBE towards MW-5 The State Water <br /> Resource Control Board document Guidelines For Investigation and Cleanup of MTBE and <br /> Other Ether-Based Oxygenates, dated 27 March 2000,recommends that"Removing MTBE <br /> from the subsurface at high concentrations is much more cost effective than extracting ground <br /> water or vapor with low concentrations" Further more,the documents states" aggressive <br /> Iinterim remediation in the source area can help to diminish the changes of creating a large <br /> dilute plume of MTBE" Current site conditions at the Flame Mini Martjustify active ground <br /> water remediation through ground water extraction <br /> Additional considerations j ustifying interim groundwater remediation at this site include (1) <br /> The high concentrations of contaminants (ie MTBE) encountered at the site that are <br /> significantly above the DHS's MCLs, (2) The high mobility of MTBE dissolved in the First <br /> Water Zone (54 to 65'feet), (3) the apparent migration (down-gradient) of the Flame Mini- <br /> Mart dissolved MTBE plume,at least 125 feet towards the south, as evidenced by increasing <br /> I MTBE concentrations at MW-5, and (4) successful pump-and-treat remediation results <br /> achieved from other nearby sites <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> 1 <br />