Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />' Appendix A - Site Background Information <br /> AGE-NC Project No 99-0624 <br />' Page 3 of 4 <br /> I analysis of grab water samples detected MTBE from CP 1-1 at depths of 60 feet and 76 feet <br /> bsg at concentrations of 88 lig/l and 1 6 �Lg/l,respectively, from CPT-2 at depths of 76 feet, <br /> 80 feet and 100 feet at concentrations as high as 49µg/l,and from CPT-3 at depths of 68 feet <br />' and 100 feet bsg at concentrations of 37 µg/1 and 4 3 µg/l, respectively MTBE was not <br /> detected in water samples collected from CPT-4 (Table 1) A report of findings (Cone <br /> Penetrometer Testing(CPT)Report-November 2001, dated 21 June 2002) was submitted <br />' by AGE to the SJCEHD <br /> July 2003 - Ground water monitoring wells MW-6 and MW-7 were installed at the site to <br />' depths of 65 feet bsg and 90 feet bsg, respectively, installation of off-site well (MW-5)was <br /> not conducted due to permitting issues TPH-g was detected in the 25-foot soil sample from <br /> MW-6 and the 50-foot soil sample from MW-7 at concentrations of 3 0 mg/kg and 12 mg/kg, <br /> respectively, MTBE was detected from MW-7 at depths between 50 feet and 90 feet bsg at <br /> concentrations as high as 28 mg/kg,respectively,TAME was detected in the 50-foot and 70- <br /> foot soil samples from MW-7 at concentrations of 0 11 mg/kg and 0 011 mg/kg,respectively, <br />' TBA was detected from MW-7 in the 50-foot soil sample at a concentration of 2 9 mg/kg <br /> Laboratory analysis of initial water samples collected from MW-7 detected MTBE at a <br /> concentration of 16 [ig/l A report of findings(Quarterly Report-Third Quarter 2003, dated <br /> 02 February 2004) was submitted by AGE to the SJCEHD <br />' Between November 1999 and September 2003, fourteen ground water monitoring events were <br /> performed at the site to monitor dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in ground water <br /> and to characterize ground water flow direction and gradient on the site Generally, TPH-g was <br /> detected in water samples collected from wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 at concentrations as high <br /> as 23,000 µg/l, BTEX compounds from wells MW-1 through MW-3 at concentrations as high as <br /> 1,700 [ig/l, and MTBE from wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-7 at concentrations as high as <br /> 19,000 pg/1 <br /> Based on the current area bound by wells MW-1 through MW-7, the lateral extent of the dissolved <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon plume is not known toward the south The vertical extent is marginally <br /> defined beneath the UST tank pit area(MW-7) and approximately 85 feet south (downgradient) of <br /> the former UST tank pit area(CPT-1) <br /> 5.0. REGIONAL GEOLOGIC SETTING <br /> According to a Geologic Map of California, published in 1966 by the California Department of <br /> Conservation Division of Mines and Geology,the site area is within the Great Valley Geomorphic <br /> Province(GVGP)of California, a large, elongate,northwest trending structural trough The GVGP <br /> . is subdivided into two mayor divisions designated the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys, which <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />