Laserfiche WebLink
SOUTH SAN 6OAQUIN' IRRIGATION DISTRICT <br /> 11011 East Highwaj' 120 . Manteca, California 95336 <br /> (209 ) 823-3101., FA% . (209 ) 823-8406 <br /> February 13 , 19&CElVED <br /> San Joaquin County Planning Department FEB <br /> 1810 E. Hazelton Avenue 1 `� 19Bg <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 SAN i0,A <br /> ATTENTION: RICHARD LARROUY PLANN//VG p COL/NT� <br /> SUBJECT: MS-89-58 (MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR RICHARD ESKES #243-032-15 VIS/ON <br /> The District' s standard request regarding tentative parcel <br /> maps is that all District easements be shown on the final map. <br /> This enables the District, property owners, and others to <br /> clearly define that portion of the property affected by District <br /> facilities. <br /> In most cases there are recorded documents that identify the <br /> perimeters of the easement which can easily be plotted on the <br /> parcel maps . However , there are instances when the District has <br /> either a prescriptive right-of-use or an unrecorded agreement to <br /> convey an easement on file which may or may not not clearly <br /> define the easement width. In such cases, the width of the <br /> easement required is determined on an individual basis . The type <br /> of facility involved and the width of similar types of facilities <br /> are generally factors considered in determining necessary right- <br /> of-way widths. In the event that a recorded document does not <br /> exist for a District facility within subject property, the <br /> District requests to be notified so that information can be <br /> provided to create a recorded easement on the final map. <br /> Additionally, applicants should be apprised that the <br /> District requires property owners to enter into an encroachment <br /> agreement with the District before any buildings , utilities, <br /> driveways, or other such encroachments are allowed within the <br /> easement. It should also be noted that certain encroachments <br /> such as an access driveway or a road crossing of a non-reinforced <br /> District pipeline is generally not permitted unless that portion <br /> of pipeline is replaced with reinforced concrete pipe. <br /> With regard to the proposed "re-parceling" , it should be <br /> noted that it is the responsibility of the individuals involved, <br /> and not the District to provide for private irrigation <br /> facilities, and easements should it be determined that a need <br /> exists for irrigation service to the smaller parcel . <br /> It is further requested that all applicants desiring to <br /> create small parcels for homesites and the like implement <br /> measures necessary to insure that the smaller parcels will not be <br /> subject to flooding from adjacent irrigated land. <br /> Sin erely yours, <br /> T �r g4 r,�_-� <br /> Sam F. Bologn <br /> Engineering Department <br /> SFB/rab <br /> Engineering /T.Map-A <br />