Laserfiche WebLink
' Report of Findings <br /> Frontier Transportation <br />' 03-28-98 <br /> March 28, 1998 <br /> In January of 1998, BEI, Inc. advanced four(4) groundwater monitoring wells (MW-4 <br /> through MW-7) to assess the extent of subsurface contamination beneath the site (See Figure 4, <br />' 1997 Site Layout Map). Results of this investigation are presented in Section 4.0 in this report. <br /> 3.0) SITE GEOLOGY/HYDROGEOLOGY <br />' The site is located on the boundary ry of the Sacramento V lley and the San Joaquin Valley <br /> within the west-central portion of the Great Valley Geomorphic province of California. The <br />' Great Valley has been filled with a sequence of older to younger alluvium of Pliocene to Holocene <br /> age which overlay sedimentary rocks of Cretaceous to Tertiary age. These sedimentary units, in <br /> turn, overlay a crystalline basement of Paleozoic and Mesozoic metamorphic and igneous rocks. <br /> The shallow subsurface geology in the site vicinity is a heterogeneous mix of gravel, sand, silt, and <br /> clay (Reference; Site Characterizalign Report, Twining Laboratories, October 16, 1996). BEI, <br /> Inc. encountered clay and a heterogeneous mix of clay from 0' to 25' bg. Boring logs are <br />' presented as Appendix A. <br /> l <br /> ie First subsurface water was encountered at depths from I P to 12' bg during tank removal <br /> and monitoring well installation at this site in 1995 and 1996. The flow direction for this <br /> subsurface water was identified as northwesterly with a shallow gradient of 0.002 feet per foot <br />' (Reference; Site Characterizalign Report, Twining Laboratories, October 16, 1996). BEI, Inc. <br /> encountered first subsurface water between 10' and 16'bg. The groundwater gradient flows to <br /> the south beneath the site as determined by data collected in March of 1998 (See Figure 5, <br />' Groundwater Gradient Map). <br /> 4.0) MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION <br /> On January 13 and 14, 1998, four (4) 2" diameter groundwater monitoring wells (MW-4 <br /> through MW-7)were installed to 20' bg (MW-4 was advanced to 26' bg)to assess the extent of <br />' contamination as identified by monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3. Groundwater--- <br /> samples were subsequently collected from all monitoring wells (MW-1"through MW-7) on March <br /> 4, 1998. <br />' A hollow stem auger was used to provide the soil borings for well installation. The <br /> hollow stem auger was 8-inches outside diameter and 4Y.,-inches inside diameter. All well <br /> materials were installed through the hollow stem to allow maximum control during placement. <br />' Each well consisted of a central section composed of riser, screen and sump. The annular <br /> space around the sump and screen was filled with sand to 4' bg_ This was overlain with a 5' seal <br /> 4 <br /> 1 <br />