My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_REVISED FEASIBILITY STUDY 2000
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINCOLN
>
55
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009302
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_REVISED FEASIBILITY STUDY 2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2020 5:43:41 PM
Creation date
2/13/2020 3:16:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
REVISED FEASIBILITY STUDY 2000
RECORD_ID
PR0009302
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004002
FACILITY_NAME
MORTON-ALCO
STREET_NUMBER
55
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
LINCOLN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13737004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
55 S LINCOLN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Treadwell&Rollo <br /> • <br /> hazard-based concentrations were determined in the Risk Assessment, and can be used to set <br /> alternative target concentrations. For example,the target cancer risk-based benzene <br /> concentration is groundwater for landscape maintenance workers at Area 15 is 294 ug/1, as <br /> opposed to the benzene MCL of 1 ug/1. Use of alternative cleanup values will be determined by <br /> the SJCEHD. <br /> 4.3.1 Monitoring Only <br /> Monitoring Only is potentially applicable for sites where groundwater contamination has been <br /> found at relatively low levels, and for sites with treatment operations that are near completion. It <br /> does not require a specific technology, and is generally a low-cost alternative. This option would <br /> require defining acceptable closure levels that may exceed MCLs, particularly for sites with <br /> active groundwater treatment systems. This alternative has been retained for consideration. <br /> • 4.3.2 Collection <br /> Groundwater collection and treatment is a viable remedial alternative at sites with known <br /> contamination. The technology of extracting groundwater from unconsolidated sediments is well <br /> defined, as are the various treatment alternatives. To a lesser extent, this response action has <br /> been used at Areas 15, 16, and 21, when groundwater in UST excavations was removed and <br /> disposed of off site. Capital and operations and maintenance costs for groundwater collection <br /> are medium, relative to other alternatives. The collection alternative has been retained for <br /> consideration. <br /> 4.3.3 Treatment <br /> Two variations of physical treatment and two of chemical treatment were screened. Physical <br /> treatment options include air sparging and vacuum extraction, and chemical treatment includes <br /> ozone sparging and hydrogen peroxide injection. Air sparging may be applicable for <br /> remediation of light-end petroleum hydrocarbons and chlorinated compounds by enhancing <br /> • bioremediation. Vacuum extraction has limited application for groundwater remediation,but <br /> 33 <br /> 25970318.PGS 15 November 2000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.