Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> TABLE 8 <br /> Comparison of Remedial Action Alternatives for Groundwater <br /> Reduction of <br /> Toxicityl <br /> Overall Protection 11 Pility/ <br /> of Human Health/ ARAR Long-Term Short-Term Volume Implcmen- Regulatory Community Cost <br /> Alternative Environment Compliant Effectiveness Effectiveness (T/M/V) tability Acceptance Acceptance <br /> No Action Not Protective No Not Effective Not Effective No Reduction Implementable Not Acceptable Not Acceptable Low <br /> Monitoring Only Not Protective No Not Effective Not Effective No Reduction ImplementablePossibly Possibly ble Acceptable Acceptable <br /> Collection and Protective Yes Effective Relatively Reduction of Implemenable Acceptable Acceptable MoHl�e to <br /> Treatment Effective T/MN <br /> Treatment <br /> • Air sparging Protective Yes Effective for Effective for Reduction of Implementable Acceptable Acceptable Moderate <br /> lighter lighter T/M/V (in use at <br /> volatiles volatiles Area 16) <br /> • Vacuum Protective Yes Effective for Effective for Reduction of Implemenable Acceptable Acceptable Moderate <br /> extraction lighter lighter T/M/V (in use at <br /> volatiles volatiles Area 16) <br /> • Ozone Protective Yes Effective for Effective for Reduction of Implementable Acceptable Acceptable Moderate <br /> all volatiles all volatiles T/M/V <br /> sparging <br /> • Hydrogen Protective Yes Effective for Effective for Reduction of Implementable Acceptable Acceptable Moderate to <br /> all volatiles all volatiles T/M/V High <br /> peroxide <br /> injection <br /> 259703/Tables/Table 8 <br />