My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0081346 SSCRPT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUGUSTA
>
595
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0081346 SSCRPT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2020 4:35:04 PM
Creation date
2/19/2020 2:12:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSCRPT
RECORD_ID
SR0081346
PE
2603
FACILITY_NAME
MS LISA JENNINGS
STREET_NUMBER
595
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
AUGUSTA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
WOODBRIDGE
Zip
95258
APN
01534060
ENTERED_DATE
10/30/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
595 E AUGUSTA ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r���The predominate wind direction through the region is to the east-southeast. West-northwest, <br /> or upgradient wind shed comes through the Altamont Pass and over agricultural production <br /> land. <br /> Although the pesticide DDT was banned in 1972, its presence in San Joaquin Valley soils is <br /> an indication of its long half-life. It is extremely unlikely there are any concentrations of <br /> DDT or its degradates in the property soils from farming operations that may have taken <br /> place on the property. Any minute residual pesticide concentrations are inconsequential. <br /> § 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above ground and below ground <br /> sources of contamination identified at the project site are included in Section 3.2. No <br /> sources of current aboveground contamination were observed, other than the referenced non- <br /> hazardous items. <br /> § 3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of <br /> contamination identified in the area of the project site that could impact the site include: <br /> Information conveyed by the ERS documents indicate listings with a highly unlikely impact <br /> to the property from a listed site. The GeoTracker document illustrates listings within a one- <br /> half mile radius from the property that are downgradient with respect to directional <br /> groundwater flow. There are no Leaking Underground Fuel Tanks (LUFT) on, or adjacent <br /> to the subject parcel. <br /> Agricultural spray drift affecting the property from the nearest agricultural production land is <br /> an extremely slight possibility, since agricultural production occurs one-half mile to the <br /> west. <br /> §3.5 Descriptions of all current off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources <br /> of contamination identified in the area of the project site include those referenced in <br /> Sections 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 above. Any contaminated sites can be considered"past" off-site <br /> sources of contamination that are simultaneously"current"contaminated sources. <br /> § 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF <br /> CONTAMINATION IDENTIFIED AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION <br /> § 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified in the above <br /> Sections have been discussed in the respective Sections to facilitate the transfer of <br /> information to the reader. <br /> -5- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.