|
Agenda -4- 15 October 2004
<br /> 17. Uncontested Rescissions
<br /> a. Alpine Forest Park,Inc.,Kern County,Order No. 72-255
<br /> b. Sunrise Handy Market,Tulare County,Order No. 88-004
<br /> C. Murrieta Westlands Trust and managed by Westside Resource Conservation District,Fresno County,Order No.94-299
<br /> 18. Uncontested Waste Discharge Requirements
<br /> a. Sierra Cedar Products,Incorporated,Former Feather River Forest Products Site,Enhanced Bioremediation Pilot Study,
<br /> Marysville,Yuba County(new)
<br /> b. Kruger Foods,Inc.—SMS Briners Vegetable Brining Facility,Closure,Post Closure and Corrective Action of Surface
<br /> Impoundments, San Joaquin County(update)
<br /> C. Stanislaus County Department of Public Works,Fink Road Class II and Class III Landfills,Class II Surface
<br /> Impoundments, Stanislaus County(update)
<br /> d. Forward Inc. and Allied Waste Inc.,Closure of French Camp Landfill, San Joaquin County(update)
<br /> e. Conti Group Companies,Incorporated,French Camp Grain Elevator,Enhanced Remediation Pilot Study, San Joaquin
<br /> County(revision)
<br /> f. County of Madera and Madera Disposal Systems,Inc., for Construction and Operation,Fairmead Municipal Solid Waste
<br /> Landfill,Madera County(revision)
<br /> g. County of Merced, for Construction and Operation,Highway 59 Solid Waste Landfill,Merced County(revision)
<br /> 19. The Regional Board may meet in closed session on Thursday or Friday to consider personnel matters [Authority:
<br /> Government Code Section 11126(a)]; to deliberate on a decision to be reached based upon evidence introduced in a
<br /> hearing [Authority: Government Code Section 11126(c)(3)]; or to discuss matters in litigation, including discussion of
<br /> initiated litigation, significant exposure to litigation, or decisions to initiate litigation [Authority: Government Code Section
<br /> 11126(e)]. Litigation items that may be discussed are:
<br /> a. CVRWQCB, et al. v. Aerojet-General Corp., et al, Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct. No. 286073, consolidated with Nos.
<br /> 288302 and 291981; CVRWQCB, et al. v. Aerojet-General Corp., et al., USDC (EDCaI) No. CIV-S-86-0064-EJG
<br /> (consolidated with U.S. v. Aerojet-General Corp., et al., USDC (EDCaI) No. CIV-S-86-0063-EJG. (Aerojet Cleanup)
<br /> b. American States Water Co., et al., v. CVRWQCB, et al., Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct. No. 99AS05947. (Aerojet
<br /> Cleanup-water supply)
<br /> c. Sacramento Regional Co. Sanitation Dist. v. SWRCB, et al., Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct. No. 98CS01702.
<br /> d. State of Calif., CVRWQCB, et al. v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc., et al., USDC (EDCaI) No. CIV-S-91-1167-DFL-PAN
<br /> and U.S. v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc., et al., USDC (EDCaI) No. S-91-0768 DFL/JFM. (IMM Cleanup)
<br /> e. State of Calif. ex rel CIWMB, et al. v. Edward J. Filbin, et al. (Westley Tire Fire).
<br /> f. San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc., et al. v. SWRCB, et al., Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct. No. 99CS02722. (Toxic Hot
<br /> Spots)
<br /> g. Coalition for Alternatives to Kiefer Landfill v. SWRCB, et al., Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct. No. 01CS00728. (Landfill
<br /> WDRs)
<br /> h. CVRWQCB v. A Greener Globe Corp., et al., Placer Co. Sup. Ct. No. SCV11383. (Landfill WDRs)
<br /> i. CVRWQCB v. Sonora Mining Corp., et al., Tuolumne Co. Sup. Ct. No. CV 486 (Jamestown Mine).
<br /> j. Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc. v. CVRWQCB, Sierra Co. Sup. Ct. No. 5511. (NPDES permit)
<br /> k. City of Brentwood v. CVRWQCB, Contra Costa Co. Sup. Ct. No. 2-0160. (MMP Order)
<br /> I. State of Calif., City of Lodi v. M&P Investments, et al., USDC (EDCaI) No. CIV S-00-2441 FCD. (Lodi PCE plumes)
<br /> m. City of Merced, et al., v. R.A. Fields, CVRWQCB, U.S. Court of Appeals (Ninth Cir.) D.C. No. CV-F 92-5627
<br /> (REC/DLB) EDCaI; City of Merced, et al., v. R.A. Fields, et al., USDC (EDCaI) No. CV-F 92-5627 REC/DLB.
<br /> (Merced PCE plumes)
<br /> n. National Park Service, EI Portal WWTF, Administrative Civil Liability Order No. 5-01-031. (NPDES discharge)
<br /> o. Deltakeeper, et al v. CVRWQCB, Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct. No. 03CS00032 (Ag Waiver CEQA lawsuit).
<br /> p. City of Stockton v. SWRCB et al., San Joaquin Co. Sup. Ct. No. CV020665 (NPDES permit).
<br /> q. City of Vacaville v. SWRCB et al., Solano Co. Sup. Ct. No. FCS020945 (NPDES permit).
<br /> r. Petition of City of Chico, Butte County, Edmund and Juli Johnson, California Park Association Review of Cleanup
<br /> and Abatement Order No. R5-2003-0707, SWRCB/OCC File A-1575, A-1575 (a), A-1575 (b), A-1575(c) (Humboldt
<br /> Road Burn Dump).
<br /> s. County of Sacramento v. SWRCB and CVRWQCB, Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct. No. 03CS01521
<br /> t. State of California, CVRWQCB v. AKT Development Corporation and Sunridge Development, LLC.(Referral to
<br /> AG).
<br /> u. California Farm Bureau v. SWRCB and CVRWQCB, Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct., 04CS00264 (2004 Ag Waiver
<br /> lawsuit)
<br /> v. Deltakeeper et al v. CVRWQCB and SWRCB, Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct., 04CS00235(2004 Ag Waiver lawsuit)
<br />
|