Laserfiche WebLink
Stephen Donell - 3 - 31 January 2014 <br /> General Comments <br /> 1. The number of non-detect sampling results in this Report was unexpected, as they do <br /> not correspond to previous investigation results. Due to the recent construction of the <br /> sampled wells, it is possible that equilibrium conditions were not established prior to <br /> sample collection. Therefore, another round of groundwater sampling is needed to <br /> evaluate the nature and extent of Site contamination. <br /> 2. All future reports, data, and correspondence need to be uploaded to Geo Tracker, <br /> followed by hard-copy submittal to the Regional Water Board Office in Rancho Cordova. <br /> The Phase I and II Reports, Site Assessment Work Plan and Appendix F for the Site <br /> Assessment Report must be uploaded in GeoTracker. Future submittals should be <br /> complete with all appendices included to facilitate Regional Water Board review. Larger <br /> appendices, such as analytical data, may be submitted on compact disc in future report <br /> submittals. <br /> Specific Comments <br /> 1. Current and historical sampling show elevated TPH and VOCs typical of former USTs at <br /> four concrete patch locations. Two exterior locations were designated as former UST <br /> sites during an April 2012 investigation. The other two patches are located inside the <br /> warehouse interior. Each concrete patch needs to be addressed as follows: <br /> a. Exterior South Patch <br /> Soil staining impacts were noted in photo logs found in Appendix E of the April 2012 <br /> Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report (Phase 11 Report). The <br /> Phase II Report did not note the presence of fill material or depth to the bottom of the <br /> excavation. A clean soil sample from SB-106 taken at 5-ft depth does not <br /> correspond to the observed staining in the photo log. The stained soil needs to be <br /> sampled and analyzed for Site constituents of concern, including TPH, VOCs, and <br /> nitrates. The contaminated soil will need to be removed and confirmation samples <br /> taken to document clean soil margins. <br /> b. Exterior East Patch <br /> Soil staining impacts from this former UST were also noted in Appendix E of the <br /> Phase II Report. Boring SB-1005 was advanced directly through the concrete patch, <br /> however, no soil samples were analyzed from this boring. Groundwater did not <br /> contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at SB-1005, but a soil sample from <br /> adjacent boring SV-5 contained 705 mg/kg of TPH at 2-ft depth. The contaminated <br /> soil will need to be removed and confirmation samples taken to document clean soil <br /> margins. <br /> c. Interior South Patch <br /> Photoionization detector (PID) readings in the Report boring logs showed increasing <br /> PID readings in TW-2 from approximately 5 to 12-ft bgs. Although the sample from <br /> 12 feet had the highest PID reading, only the 5-ft bgs and 25-ft bgs samples were <br /> selected for further analysis. TPH was detected at 2,980 mg/kg at 5-ft depth. March <br /> 2012 sampling results collected at 2-ft depth from sampling point SV-25, located at <br /> the north-western corner of the patch, detected approximately 46,000 mg/kg TPH. <br /> The contaminated soil will need to be removed and confirmation samples taken to <br /> document clean soil margins. <br />