My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
I
>
INDUSTRIAL
>
248
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0536908
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2020 6:40:29 PM
Creation date
2/24/2020 3:25:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0536908
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0021186
FACILITY_NAME
INDUSTRIAL DRIVE RECEIVERSHIP ESTAT
STREET_NUMBER
248
STREET_NAME
INDUSTRIAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17728020
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
248 INDUSTRIAL DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stephen Donell - 3 - 31 January 2014 <br /> General Comments <br /> 1. The number of non-detect sampling results in this Report was unexpected, as they do <br /> not correspond to previous investigation results. Due to the recent construction of the <br /> sampled wells, it is possible that equilibrium conditions were not established prior to <br /> sample collection. Therefore, another round of groundwater sampling is needed to <br /> evaluate the nature and extent of Site contamination. <br /> 2. All future reports, data, and correspondence need to be uploaded to Geo Tracker, <br /> followed by hard-copy submittal to the Regional Water Board Office in Rancho Cordova. <br /> The Phase I and II Reports, Site Assessment Work Plan and Appendix F for the Site <br /> Assessment Report must be uploaded in GeoTracker. Future submittals should be <br /> complete with all appendices included to facilitate Regional Water Board review. Larger <br /> appendices, such as analytical data, may be submitted on compact disc in future report <br /> submittals. <br /> Specific Comments <br /> 1. Current and historical sampling show elevated TPH and VOCs typical of former USTs at <br /> four concrete patch locations. Two exterior locations were designated as former UST <br /> sites during an April 2012 investigation. The other two patches are located inside the <br /> warehouse interior. Each concrete patch needs to be addressed as follows: <br /> a. Exterior South Patch <br /> Soil staining impacts were noted in photo logs found in Appendix E of the April 2012 <br /> Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report (Phase 11 Report). The <br /> Phase II Report did not note the presence of fill material or depth to the bottom of the <br /> excavation. A clean soil sample from SB-106 taken at 5-ft depth does not <br /> correspond to the observed staining in the photo log. The stained soil needs to be <br /> sampled and analyzed for Site constituents of concern, including TPH, VOCs, and <br /> nitrates. The contaminated soil will need to be removed and confirmation samples <br /> taken to document clean soil margins. <br /> b. Exterior East Patch <br /> Soil staining impacts from this former UST were also noted in Appendix E of the <br /> Phase II Report. Boring SB-1005 was advanced directly through the concrete patch, <br /> however, no soil samples were analyzed from this boring. Groundwater did not <br /> contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at SB-1005, but a soil sample from <br /> adjacent boring SV-5 contained 705 mg/kg of TPH at 2-ft depth. The contaminated <br /> soil will need to be removed and confirmation samples taken to document clean soil <br /> margins. <br /> c. Interior South Patch <br /> Photoionization detector (PID) readings in the Report boring logs showed increasing <br /> PID readings in TW-2 from approximately 5 to 12-ft bgs. Although the sample from <br /> 12 feet had the highest PID reading, only the 5-ft bgs and 25-ft bgs samples were <br /> selected for further analysis. TPH was detected at 2,980 mg/kg at 5-ft depth. March <br /> 2012 sampling results collected at 2-ft depth from sampling point SV-25, located at <br /> the north-western corner of the patch, detected approximately 46,000 mg/kg TPH. <br /> The contaminated soil will need to be removed and confirmation samples taken to <br /> document clean soil margins. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.