SU0013058 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

h i`y 3 a ' 1";,iTrisUTfy�t; .*. !41K^:Si`i rii� i nt Delta Plan pofloc* dit The Delta. PIau contains a set of tegulatoq polides that vM be enfotced by the Delta Stewatdsbip CouncTs appellate authority and ovetsi&t. The Delta Plan also contains prioxitp recommendations, which are noniP.golatory l ut can out actions essential to a6leving the coequal goals. Chapter 2 _ C P l Detailed Findings to /al This pelicyspecffles what must he addressed in a celcation of consistency fifes by a (23 CCH section b002) Establish Consistency State arlacal public agency with regard to a covered action. This policy only applles aNT tooth the Doha plat! a "propasBd action" rias been determined by a State orlacal publie.agency to be a covered action because it is t wamed by or more of rho rBgulatory pokles contained in Article 3. 1wonsistoncy with this policymaybe the basis for an appeal. Ib1 CerOcatiom ofconsistenrymust Include detailed #17dings that address each Of Ilia foliow)ng requirements: f1) Covered actions, in order ID be censismntwith the Malta PIM, muss be-consistent urith ihirregulatorypalicyarid with Bach of the regulatory polkies.containadin PArgeIg 3 irnoftieed by the covaied action, the Delta 67 Owfirdshp WWI ac nowt edges that in some cases, basad upon thenaumre ofthe covered action, full cansistaney with ell relevant ngulatory policies 28ynot be feasible. In Chase cases, ` Ilia aflencif that files the ceeication of tency may flawheless deierminB�that rite coveted action is ronsisterr Oth11 a-Delta Plan heraus on whole, that c7ton is consistent with the coBqualgoal thet datarmrnatian must in # eta wffVravas w am cansistenry with relBvant regulatory paltcfes rs oat feasible, an explanafiort of the Oasax Why rt is not feasible, and en Bxplanat 011 ofhovd the covom FUR nevem a ess, on woe; ,s consis ent wt t coequa crow s at etermrnatron rs su lett to revretti y t re eta fewer ship ouncr on appeal; 121 Cnvored actions not exempt from CF_QA must include applicable feasible m4ation measures identified U3 the ©alta Plan 's >ofogram tl!? IunlAss tht? measurefsl ars avithin Me exrlusnra jurisdiction ofan agency other than the agency that dies the cerdAre- tion of consistency), orsubstrtute mingshanmeasures that the agency thatfles the certillcatian of consistency fin& fim equallyormom effective; 13) As relevant to the purpose and nature of the project, all covered actions must document use ofbast available science, till Fcosysiam restoration and water management covemd artions mostinclude adequate ptovlsinns, appropriate toitho scope of the coveredaction, to assure continued implementation-ofadeptive management llris requirement shall be satisfied througlr both of the fallowing.& 141 An adaptive managamentplan that dwerihas the approach to be taken consistent with the adaptive managamant framewarkin AppenfIx 1B, and 191 llocumentation of access to adequate resources and delineated authority by the ondty responsible . for the implementation of thB pmposed-adaptive management PRO= PA- 1800071 — Previously Approved Findings 12