My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOCUST
>
336
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523885
>
SITE HISTORY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2020 11:38:31 PM
Creation date
2/28/2020 4:26:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
RECORD_ID
PR0523885
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0005984
FACILITY_NAME
THATER PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
336
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOCUST
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04311105
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
336 E LOCUST ST
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J. H. KLEINFELDER &ASSOCIATES <br /> File No. W-2008••1 <br /> November 14, 1985 <br /> t4 Page 3 <br /> foot above the perforated section and one foot bentonite plug was placed above <br /> the sandpack to provide a seal against surface water infiltration. The well was <br /> C <br /> placed inside a locking Brooks box to protect against vandalism. <br /> ' C 3amplinQ Procedure. <br /> 4•= Soil samples were collected at the time of drilling for chemical analyses <br /> at 5-foot intervals from 10 feet to 45 feet below the ground surface. After <br /> F; the sample was removed from the boring, the soil sample was immediately <br /> placed in a refrigerated container and delivered to California Water Labs for <br /> analytical testing. All samples were screened in the field with a <br /> Photoionization detector (PID) for qualitative indication of volatile <br /> hydrocarbons. FID values are shown or the boring logs on Plate IV. <br /> Selection of samples for quantitative chemical analysis was based on field <br /> screening and recommendations of the County Environmental Health <br /> representative present at the site during the time of sampling. A chain-of- <br /> custody form was utilized by Kleinfelder and accompanied the samples to the <br /> laboratory. Copies of the chain-of-custody forms are included in the <br /> Appendix. <br /> D. Water Sam 1� i Procedure. <br /> A water sample was collected from monitoring well (MW-1) on October <br /> 19, 1985. The well was sampled with a teflon bailer and the sample was <br /> vir•ially inspected for product layer and sheen. No product layer or sheen <br /> was observed in or on the bailer. The well was then developed until the <br /> water was relatively clear. after development, approximately five well <br /> " v:;lumes were removed and a water sample was collected in sample bottles <br /> provided by the testing laboratory. The sample bottles were immediately <br /> sealed and placed in a refrigerated container and delivered to California <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.