Laserfiche WebLink
Site Assessment Work Plan - July 1997 <br /> EF Mitchler- 400 South Lincoln Street <br /> Stockton, California <br /> 1.0. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORK <br /> In accordance with a request from Mr. Kent Gikas of the Union Safe Deposit Bank, Advanced <br /> GeoEnviroiunental, Inc. (AGE)has prepared the enclosed Site Assessment Work Plan for 400 South <br /> Lincoln Street in Stockton, California (the site). <br /> The scope of work is to assess whether the known hydrocarbon release from the Sierra Lumber site <br /> located directly south of the site at 375 Hazleton Street has impacted the soil and/or ground water <br /> on the site. e location of the site is illustrated in Figure 1 - Location iWap. A plan of the site is <br /> depicted in Figure 2 - Site Plan. <br /> This work plan is prepared in accordance with San Joaquin County Public Health Services - <br /> Environmental Health Division (PHS-EHD)and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board guidelines for the investigation of UST sites <br /> 2.0. BACKGROUND <br /> 2.1. SITE LOCATION <br /> The site is located in an industrial area of low topographic relief in Stockton, California near the <br /> intersection of Lincoln Street and Church Streets at an elevation of approximately 5 feet above sea <br /> level. The site is currently occupied by EF Mitchler, a cement mixing company. The surface of the <br /> site is covered with mostly asphalt or concrete. <br /> 2.2. UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMOVAL <br /> It is our understanding that two 1,000-gallon gasoline USTs were removed from the site in August <br /> 1991. Petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) were not detected in soil samples collected from <br /> beneath the USTs. However, toluene was detected at a concentration of 0.009 parts per million. A <br /> site closure was granted by the PHS-EHD in a letter dated 18 May 1992. No other information <br /> readily was available from files on record with the PHS-EHD. <br /> 2.3. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES <br /> One site which has been identified as a potential environmental concern to the property is discussed <br />