Laserfiche WebLink
aquifer characteristics that may limit the effectiveness of the biosparge technology include the <br /> following: <br /> • Variable Permeability - Intrinsic permeability is the ability of the soil to transmit fluid, <br /> ' both gases and liquids. The permeability used in the USEPA decision tree as a criteria <br /> for biosparging to be regarded as effective is 10-9 cm2 (Fetter 1999). Saturated silts <br /> ' encountered in the shallow permeable zone, typically have intrinsic permeability of <br /> 10-10 to 10-12 cm2, Fetter 1999. Biosparging in these shallow soils is considered only <br /> marginally effective. Silty sand soils encountered in all four permeable zone have <br /> 1 intrinsic permeability's that range from 10-9to 10-11 cm2 (Fetter 1999). Biosparging in <br /> these soils may be effective. Sands and gravelly sands encountered in the "A", `B", <br /> and "C" permeable zones have intrinsic permeability's higher than 10-9 cm2 (Fetter <br /> 1999). Biosparging is considered generally effective in these soils. <br /> • Stratified soils - The Site geology consist of sand and silty sand layers in silt and clay. <br /> There is an obvious hydraulic connection between permeable layers. However, on a <br /> ' localized level, the less permeable silt and clay would limit flow of fluid both <br /> vertically and horizontally. The stratified nature of the soil limits the effectiveness of <br /> biosparging. However, it is PSC's opinion that the stratified soil limits the <br /> effectiveness of AS/SVE to a greater degree. Biosparging at the correct interval with <br /> appropriate flow rate and appropriate injection pressure would be effective. <br /> ' • Nutrient levels — Nitrogen (expressed as ammonia) and phosphorous are required by <br /> bacteria to support cell growth. Some nutrients, found in excessive amounts will <br /> suppress the metabolic rate. The USEPA guidance document recommends a carbon: <br /> ' nitrogen: phosphorous ratio of 100:10:1. Samples of the permeable silty sand and <br /> sand layers were collected during monitoring well installation for analysis of total <br /> organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, and sulfate. Unfortunately, concentrations of <br /> ' nitrate, ammonia and ortho-phosphate were non-detect and the nutrient ratios could <br /> not be determined from soil samples. The samples submitted were CT-MW-9-87 <br /> (68.5-70'), CT-MW-9-120 (80-81.5'), and CT-MW-9-120 (115-116.5'). The data is <br /> ' summarized in Table 6. <br /> 3.5 Evaluation of Baseline Groundwater Conditions <br /> ' Some of the baseline groundwater conditions, such as temperature and pH are known to be <br /> within the acceptable ranges of the guidance document. Analysis of additional indicator <br /> parameters can be helpful in evaluating biosparging. However, the results of these indicator <br /> parameter analyses from inside a contaminant plume should be compared to suitable <br /> background. The following paragraphs discuss the <br /> ' 3.5.1 Dissolved Oxygen and Oxidation Reduction Potential <br /> CVRWQCB used DO as a criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of biosparging during the <br /> ' review of the biosparge pilot test for the Transmission Store. A criteria cited in the reviews <br /> was a DO concentration less than 2.0 mg/L indicating an anaerobic environment. USEPA <br /> Monitoring Well Installation <br /> and <br /> BioSparge Evaluation Report <br /> ' Prepared For:Sara Lee Bakery Group,Inc. 17 Prepared By:PSC Industrial Outsourcing,LP <br /> Sara Lee—Lincoln Street 20091203-MW Installation&BioSparge Evaluation Report(Final).doc Report Date:December 3,2009 <br />