Laserfiche WebLink
CLEANUP AND ABATEMENT OE'R.NO. R5-2007-0725 <br /> DOLLY MADISON/LANGENDORF BAKERY <br /> 1426 S. LINCOLN ST., STOCKTON <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> FEASIBILITY STUDY <br /> 11.By 1 July 2008, submit a Feasibility Study that provides a summary of remedial <br /> alternatives evaluated to address applicable cleanup levels for the affected or threatened <br /> human health and/or waters of the State. The Feasibility Study shall propose at least two <br /> remedial technologies that have a substantial likelihood to achieve cleanup of all <br /> impacted soils and groundwater and shall.inclAude a schedule for achieving cleanup. The <br /> remedial technologies must be evaluated with respect to their ability to be implemented, <br /> cost, and effectiveness. The Feasibility Study shall include.the rationale for selecting the <br /> preferred remedial alternative. The Discharger shall attempt to clean up each waste <br /> constituent to background concentrations, or to the lowest level that is technically and <br /> economically achievable and which complies with all applicable WQOs of the Basin Plan <br /> as set forth in Finding 27. <br /> REMEDIATION <br /> 12.Within 90 days of Regional Board staff,concurrence with the proposed remedial action <br /> described in the Feasibility Study but no later than 1 November 2008, submit a Final <br /> Remedial Plan (FRP). `The FRP must include a detailed description of the remedial <br /> actions to address cleanup of the entire groundwater plume and source area soils. The <br /> FRP shall also include a schedule to implement all remedial actions. <br /> 13.Within 60 days of Regional Board staff's approval of the FRP but no later than <br /> 1 February 2009, begin implementation -of the approved remedial actions. <br /> 14.Submit for remediation system(s), monthly status reports for the first three,months of <br /> operation of any new systems. At a minimum, the monthly status reports shall.include: <br /> • site maps indicating the capture zone and waste plumes, <br /> • average extraction rates of all treatment systems, <br /> • influent and effluent concentrations of TPHg, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, <br /> xylenes, MtBE a-nd other fuel oxygenates, 1,2 DCA, EDB, and Organic Lead, <br /> • mass of hydrocarbons treated during the reporting period and cumulative to <br /> date, - <br /> • estimated mass of wastes remaining and predicted time frame for meeting <br /> cleanup objectives, <br /> • running and down time for the remediation system(s), <br /> • summary of consultant visits to the site, and <br /> • evaluation of the overall remediation program and recommendations to correct <br /> deficiencies or increase efficiency. <br /> ' I <br />