My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINCOLN
>
1426
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0527611
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2020 1:58:18 PM
Creation date
3/4/2020 1:40:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0527611
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0018709
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER DOLLY MADISON
STREET_NUMBER
1426
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
LINCOLN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16503010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1426 S LINCOLN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
308
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLEANUP AND ABATEMENT OE'R.NO. R5-2007-0725 <br /> DOLLY MADISON/LANGENDORF BAKERY <br /> 1426 S. LINCOLN ST., STOCKTON <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> FEASIBILITY STUDY <br /> 11.By 1 July 2008, submit a Feasibility Study that provides a summary of remedial <br /> alternatives evaluated to address applicable cleanup levels for the affected or threatened <br /> human health and/or waters of the State. The Feasibility Study shall propose at least two <br /> remedial technologies that have a substantial likelihood to achieve cleanup of all <br /> impacted soils and groundwater and shall.inclAude a schedule for achieving cleanup. The <br /> remedial technologies must be evaluated with respect to their ability to be implemented, <br /> cost, and effectiveness. The Feasibility Study shall include.the rationale for selecting the <br /> preferred remedial alternative. The Discharger shall attempt to clean up each waste <br /> constituent to background concentrations, or to the lowest level that is technically and <br /> economically achievable and which complies with all applicable WQOs of the Basin Plan <br /> as set forth in Finding 27. <br /> REMEDIATION <br /> 12.Within 90 days of Regional Board staff,concurrence with the proposed remedial action <br /> described in the Feasibility Study but no later than 1 November 2008, submit a Final <br /> Remedial Plan (FRP). `The FRP must include a detailed description of the remedial <br /> actions to address cleanup of the entire groundwater plume and source area soils. The <br /> FRP shall also include a schedule to implement all remedial actions. <br /> 13.Within 60 days of Regional Board staff's approval of the FRP but no later than <br /> 1 February 2009, begin implementation -of the approved remedial actions. <br /> 14.Submit for remediation system(s), monthly status reports for the first three,months of <br /> operation of any new systems. At a minimum, the monthly status reports shall.include: <br /> • site maps indicating the capture zone and waste plumes, <br /> • average extraction rates of all treatment systems, <br /> • influent and effluent concentrations of TPHg, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, <br /> xylenes, MtBE a-nd other fuel oxygenates, 1,2 DCA, EDB, and Organic Lead, <br /> • mass of hydrocarbons treated during the reporting period and cumulative to <br /> date, - <br /> • estimated mass of wastes remaining and predicted time frame for meeting <br /> cleanup objectives, <br /> • running and down time for the remediation system(s), <br /> • summary of consultant visits to the site, and <br /> • evaluation of the overall remediation program and recommendations to correct <br /> deficiencies or increase efficiency. <br /> ' I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.