My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINCOLN
>
1426
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0527611
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2020 1:58:18 PM
Creation date
3/4/2020 1:40:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0527611
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0018709
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER DOLLY MADISON
STREET_NUMBER
1426
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
LINCOLN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16503010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1426 S LINCOLN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
308
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> ' Tri IZe_ional Reconlnlcndations Page 17 of 24 <br /> Appendix ;1 <br /> Disposal melhixls requiring either file 5.0 VFRIFICA,riON NION1TORING-§2727 <br /> Regional Board's General Permit for dis- <br /> chane to surface wafer(NPDLS)or land Verification monitoring includes all activities <br /> t�\bRs) nla) be evaluated. Selection of this required to verify implementation of the CAI' and' <br /> type Ofdisposal requires the responsible evaluate its effectiveness. The discharger shall <br /> part' to sub+flit an application and support verify successful completion of the CAP throuu)h <br /> i112 documentation in a timely sampling or other monitoring of soil and/or <br /> manner. (See Region 5 Web page). groundwater for a period of time determined bv <br /> the lead agency to demonstrate that seasonal <br /> 4.3 Final Remediation Plan ('FRP) groundwater tluctualions will not mobilize any <br /> remaining contamination in quantities sufficient to <br /> The FRP is a corrective action implementation degrade water quality and that rebound of <br /> ligan \yith detailed plans of the appr6ved remedial contaminant concentrations will be ItlSlzniticalll. <br /> system to be installed. and a proposed schedule Using the monitoring results obtained during this <br /> for sv.sIcnl construction and startup.- period_ the discharger shall evaluate the <br /> effectiveness•ofconecilve actions at the site: <br /> The FRP is to include the follovy.ing mininlum- <br /> information: <br /> 6.0 NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED <br /> • A description of thelemedial technology (NFAR) REPORTING <br /> approved by the LIA and!or Re`ional <br /> 13oaId. All regulatOrx agencies. including the Regional <br /> Board. are required tO issue a standard Case <br /> • A IiSI1112 Ofihe approved cleanup levels NIFAR letter when closure is appropriate. That <br /> from the PAR. and predicted timeframe to letter,is described in Section 25296.10(,) of elle <br /> meet these cleanup levels using the selected I-lealth and Safety Code. Mlle purpose for a <br /> remedial alternative. N17AR report is to provide a document upon <br /> which the regulator nlav slake an objective <br /> • Detailed plans for installation of the ap- decision regarding a request by the responsible <br /> proved remedial alternative; such as soil to party for site NFAR when conlam-inants retrain <br /> he excavated. layout of the soil vapor ex- but are.no longer considered to be a significant <br /> taction s\stenl, air.spar.ge'injection points. risk. (See Disclaimer. page 2). In general.. <br /> the number and placement of remedial Regional Board staff approve NFAR requests <br /> wells and associated equipment,-the pro- when risks to public health and.safety and- <br /> posed punlpith_> rate. disposal of wastes, etc. ecological receptors are reduced to insignificant <br /> levels and: <br /> • A .discussion of implementation.. including a <br /> phased schedule for construction and sys- i. Groundwater qualit0beneficial uses are not . <br /> tem startup. threatened by soil contamination. and <br /> chemical contaminants iII 21`01111dwater <br /> • Operation and maintenance procedures. have been renlediated tonon-detectable <br /> tests. and schedules including.star1tlp.'lO1lg- 'levels. or <br /> Itl'lll Il1011llOt'lll' pl'Ogl-ail/ for influent and " <br /> eflluen't concentrations and periodic evalua _. Groundwater contains detectable'contanni- <br /> tion ofthe need for systenl opt inli-r_ation. Hants below water quality objectives and <br /> concentrations are expected. to reach back ! <br /> Sh011ld delaVS occur or time extensions be needed.' _ „rotund conditions throu1.1h natural pros- <br /> slich requests. with supporting documentation; are esses within a reasonable period of-tinW. Or <br /> to be submitted b\ later to Mie LIA and/or Re- <br /> oional Board• Groundwater contains contaminants above <br /> 3. <br /> water quality objectives. where best avail- <br /> i <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.