Laserfiche WebLink
Dolly Madison/Langendorf B �ry - 2 - 24 April 2008 <br /> 1426 S. Lincoln St., Stockton../ <br /> Comments: <br /> My 4 April 2008 letter stated in part "...In Stratus' 25 March 2008 letter, they requested an <br /> extension to the 1 May 2008 deadline, however they failed to request a specific alternative <br /> deadline. Please submit both an anticipated new deadline and provide your supporting <br /> justification, by 23 April 2008, for said new deadline for our evaluation of reasonableness. You <br /> and your consultant, Stratus, have previously been informed that any changes to the existing <br /> CAO, whose established deadlines were reviewed by all Responsible Parties with a reasonable <br /> comment period allowed prior to issuance, would result in the preparation of a new CAO, which <br /> is time and staff resource consuming. Further, you and Stratus were also informed that if you <br /> continue all required activities in a timely, cooperative manner, and that any delays that are <br /> encountered cannot be shown to be a direct result of recalcitrant, unreasonable, or negligent <br /> actions by yourself or your consultant, Regional Board staff will not recommend enforcement <br /> actions. As such, I recommend that you make every reasonable effort to complete all required <br /> tasks in a timely manner, and continue to keep Regional Board staff updated as to your <br /> progress with each required CAO action." <br /> The schedule proposed in the Letter seems reasonable with one exception. The submittal of <br /> the PAR by 10 October 2008 is not reasonable, in that adequate data has been collected to <br /> submit a PAR and the PAR delay will affect the schedules for other required actions of the <br /> CAO. Additional investigations are often required to further define the extent of contamination <br /> after a PAR is submitted. Moreover, full delineation of extent of contamination is not a <br /> requirement to submit a PAR, per the Regional Board staff guidance (Appendix A) that was <br /> included with the CAO package. Regional Board staff will not recommend enforcement if the <br /> PAR is submitted by 30 June 2008, which should not cause delays to the remaining required <br /> actions in the CAO, namely the submittal of the Final Remediation Plan (FRP), due <br /> 1 November 2008; the first monthly remediation status report and the implementation of the <br /> approved remedial action, both are due 1 February 2009; and current/subsequent <br /> monitoring/status reports. <br /> I request that a monthly compliance report, due the last day of each month, be sent by email to <br /> me at the email address below. The compliance report will provide a brief summary of the <br /> progress towards compliance with the CAO, and provide advance warning of anticipated delays <br /> as problems arise. If necessary, a dialogue with Regional Board staff will follow to resolve the <br /> problem(s) so that compliance with the CAO can be achieved. <br /> Your, all parties named above, and Stratus' acknowledgement of receipt of this letter is <br /> requested by 30 April 2008. Please contact me at (916) 464-4615, or I can be reached by <br /> e ail at jbarton waterboards.ca.gov. <br /> AMES L. L. BARTON, P.G. <br /> Engineering Geologist <br />