Laserfiche WebLink
.l <br /> a <br /> . Mr Travis Bryant Project 22605-10102 <br /> January 28, 1998 <br /> Page 2 <br /> On February 25, 1997, an EMCON geologist observed V&W Drilling, Inc , of Rio Vista, <br /> California, drill three vertical soil borings (B-1, B-2, and B-3) Soil boring B-1 was converted to <br /> vapor extraction well VW-1, and borings B-2 and B-3 were converted to groundwater monitoring <br /> wells MW-1 and MW-2, respectively Based on analytical data collected from the soil borings, <br /> residual hydrocarbons were detected in soil borings B-1 through B-3 The highest concentrations <br /> were detected in soil boring B-1, drilled beneath the former UST Residual petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons were not detected in the vadose zone (0 to 21 5 feet below ground surface) soil <br /> borings B-2 and B-3, but were detected in the saturated zone Analytical results of groundwater <br /> indicated dissolved hydrocarbons were detected in monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 (EMCON, <br /> August 4, 1997) TPHG was detected 1n monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 at concentrations of <br /> 18,000 parts per billion (ppb) and 220 ppb, respectively Benzene was detected in monitoring <br /> wells MW-1 and MW-2 at concentrations of 4,400 and 33 ppb, respectively <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING. FOURTH QUARTER 1997 <br /> On November 17, 1997, an EMCON technician was on site to measure depths to groundwater and <br /> collect groundwater samples from wells MW-1 and MW-2 for subjective and laboratory analyses <br /> Floating product was not observed in groundwater monitoring wells (see table) EMCON used the <br /> data to evaluate changes in concentrations of dissolved gasoline hydrocarbons in the groundwater and <br /> changes in the gradient and direction of groundwater flow beneath the site EMCON's sampling and <br /> analysis procedures are presented In Appendix A <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 and were analyzed at <br /> Sequoia Analytical in Sacramento, California The groundwater samples were analyzed for TPHG, <br /> benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTE? ) using U S Environmental Protection <br /> Agency (USEPA) Modified Methods DHS/LUFT and 8020, respectively The groundwater <br /> samples were also analyzed for the oxygenates methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), tertiary <br /> butanol, di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), and tertiary amyl methyl <br /> ether (TAME) using USEPA Method 8260 (according to the California Regional Water Quality <br /> Control Board requirements) Copies of the cham-of-custody records and laboratory analysis reports <br /> are presented in Appendix B <br /> The results of laboratory analyses indicated that dissolved hydrocarbons were present in the monitoring <br /> wells TPHG was detected in monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 at concentrations of 280 and <br /> 290 ppb, respectively Benzene was detected in monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 at concentrations <br /> of 56 and 48 ppb, respectively The results of laboratory analyses for the oxygenates MTBE, tertiary <br /> butanol, DIPS, ETBE, and TAME were all below laboratory detection limits Results of laboratory <br /> analyses are presented in Tables 1 and 2 <br /> • <br /> 5AC\N 1PJ212605126051010 2AB-9811baccus 1 <br />