My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004242
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINCOLN
>
401
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545380
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004242
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2020 4:03:31 PM
Creation date
3/4/2020 4:00:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0004242
RECORD_ID
PR0545380
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0012145
FACILITY_NAME
INDEPENDENT TRUCKING
STREET_NUMBER
401
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
LINCOLN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
401 S LINCOLN ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 5. 0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br />' Groundwater samples were collected on June 5 , 2000 Depth-to- <br /> groundwater was measured using an electric water level meter <br /> prior to groundwater sampling activities Groundwater sampling <br /> involved bailing approximately three to five well casing volumes <br />' of water out of the wells prior to sampling Parameters such as <br /> water clarity, pH, temperature, specific conductance, and volume <br /> extracted were measured during purging (Table 3 ) The wells were <br />' bailed near--continuously until all stagnant water was removed <br /> Groundwater samples were collected manually (hand-bailed) using a <br /> Teflon bailer from each monitoring well The samples were <br /> transferred into 40-m1 VOA vials and 1-liter amber-colored glass <br /> bottles with a Teflon septa The samples were stored in a <br /> chilled cooler containing crushed ice to maintain the sample at <br /> 4°C for delivery to the laboratory Strict chain-of-custody <br /> protocols were followed in all phases of sample handling <br />' All equipment used during the sampling activities which came in <br /> contact with contaminated material were thoroughly decontaminated <br /> before and after each use This was accomplished by washing with <br /> Alconox (a laboratory-grade detergent) and rinsing with distilled <br /> water <br />' 6. 0 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION AND FLOW <br /> The elevation of the groundwater surface (potentiometric surface) <br />' was measured for each monitoring well to evaluate the direction <br /> of groundwater flow at the Site Groundwater level measurements <br /> were recorded using an electronic water-level probe attached to <br /> an engineer ' s measuring tape graduated to 0 01-foot intervals <br />' Measurements were recorded from the top of the groundwater <br /> surface to the top of the well casing The difference between <br />' the top of the well casing elevation and the depth to the top of <br /> the groundwater surface is a measurement of the potentiometric <br /> surface of the groundwater table <br />' Measured depth to groundwater levels at the Site ranged from <br /> -3 . 23 feet (MW-2 ) to -3 38 feet (MW-3 ) above mean sea level <br /> Mapping and analysis of the groundwater elevation data suggest <br />' that the local groundwater gradient flows in a northeasterly <br /> direction The top of well casing elevations, depth-to-- <br /> groundwater, and the computed elevation of the groundwater <br />' surface is listed in Table 2 Figure 4 shows the water-level <br /> data collected and interpreted contour lines <br />' 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.