Laserfiche WebLink
' C�eoloAAical�"ecF=nics Znc. Page 2 <br /> Siaclazr Truckulg-QMR <br /> Project No. 320.2 <br /> February 11,2000 <br />' It is recommended that: <br /> 1. That testing for MTBE and the other OFCs should be discontinued. <br /> 2. A work plan for the further definition of soil and groundwater contamination has been <br /> submitted. This work should be implemented as soon as cost pre-approval from the fund <br />' is received. <br />' 1.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> 1.1 Hydrology of Site <br />' On December 20, 1999, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support personnel measured the four <br /> monitoring wells for depth to groundwater. The average depth to water was measured to be <br /> approximately 12.4 feet from the top of casing measuring point. The groundwater gradient <br />' and bearing of flow were calculated to be 0.0038 ft/ft, flowing N43°E, respectively. This <br /> hydrologic behavior is consistent with previous.groundwater_gradients.measured at this site. <br /> Figure 2 is a map showing both the water table and intermediate groundwater gradients. <br /> Appendix D shows an example of the mathematical calculations used to obtain the <br />' groundwater gradient. <br /> 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> On December 20, 1999, Dei-Tech Geotechnical Support personnel arrived on-site, opened <br /> the wells, and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape. The <br /> water level reading was recorded to an accuracy of 0.01 foot. In wells where free floating <br /> product was suspected, a clear disposable bailer was used to gauge the interface. <br /> Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using a Centrifugal pump as recorded in the <br /> field logs (Appendix Q. The rate of well purging was monitored. The wells were purged of <br />' at least three casing volumes or until the groundwater parameters (temperature, conductivity, <br /> and pH) had stabilized (Appendix C) indicating that water, representative of actual aquifer <br /> conditions, was entering the well. Groundwater parameter stabilization was characterized by <br />' three successive readings within 10%. <br /> Before a sample was collected, the well's water level was allowed to recharge to at least 80% <br /> of its initial level. All water removed from the monitoring wells and not used as a sample, <br />' was placed in a 55 gallon DOT (Department of Transportation 17-11) approved container that <br /> is properly labeled and temporally stored on-site. <br />' A stainless steel bailer was used to collect each sample. Bailer cleanliness was assured by <br /> collecting a bailer blank (pouring distilled water through the bailer and collecting it in a VOA <br /> vial)prior to collecting the analytical sample. <br />' - Extreme care was exercised while collecting samples to prevent agitation of the water <br /> contained in the bailer and to minimizes sample aeration during transfer of the sample into <br /> the bottles. Water samples were transferred from the bailer into 40-m1 VOA vials preserved <br /> with hydrochloric acid. All samples were checked for headspace bubbles, labeled, inserted <br /> into foam holders and placed in an ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory. <br /> 1 <br />