Laserfiche WebLink
05 September 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0100 <br /> Page 7 of 9 <br />' 3.5. MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION <br /> Based on the detection of MTBE in the grab ground water sample collected from the confirmation <br />' soil boring, a ground water investigation was required by the SJC-EHD. AGE submitted two work <br /> plans for the installation and sampling of ground water monitoring wells(AGE work plans titled Work <br /> Plan -April 1999, dated 23 April 1999 and Work Plan for Additional Well Installation-December <br /> 2000, dated 20 December 2000_). Both work plans were approved by the SJC-EHD in letters dated <br /> 29 April 1999 and 01 January 2 00 1, respectively. <br /> On 23 August 1999,one ground water monitoring well designated well MW-I was installed on-site. <br /> ' On 21 September 1999, two additional ground water monitoring wells, designated as wells MW-2 <br /> and MW-3, were installed at the site. Soil samples were collected at 5-foot intervals. <br /> During the placement of the portland cement in the upper annular space of the soil boring, cement <br /> infiltrated the filter pack of well MW-3 to a depth of 55 feet bsg. Additionally, monitoring well MW-1 <br /> was damaged during re-development by Cal Nev Exploration Drilling and sand had infiltrated the <br /> casing to a depth of 50 feet bsg. Therefore, the two wells were abandoned under permit on <br /> ' 28 January 2000. Grout was pumped into the wells and pressurized to allow for the grout to enter <br /> the filter pack completely. On 03 February 2000 the two wells were re-installed at the site. TPH-g <br /> and BTEX compounds were not detected in the fifteen soil samples analyzed. The oxygenated fuel <br /> l <br /> ie additive MTBE was detected in three of the soil samples analyzed. The analytical results of soil <br /> samples are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. <br /> On 11 June and 12 June 2001, additional ground water monitoring wells, designated wells MW-4, <br /> MW-5 and MW-6 were installed at the site to delineate the vertical and lateral extent of the MTBE <br /> impacted ground water. Soli samples were collected at 5-foot intervals. A total of 9 soil samples were <br /> analyzed for TPH-g, BTEX and MTBE. No analytes were detected at or above laboratory reporting <br /> ' limits in the soil samples. The analytical results of soil samples are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. <br /> Monitoring wells MW-1 to MW-3 and MW-5 and MW-6 were completed as ground water <br /> ' monitoring wells using two-inch diameter PVC casing from approximately 40 feet to 60 feet bsg. <br /> Monitoring well MW-4 was completed as a 2-inch diameter depth-discrete well at the former UST <br /> dispenser and was screened from approximately 95 feet to 100 feet bsg. <br /> ' 3.9. WELL MONITORING AND SAMPLE ANALYSIS <br /> ' Water samples were collected from wells MW-1 to MW-3 during eleven ground water sampling <br /> events, and water samples were collected from wells MW-4 to MW-6 during five ground water <br /> sampling events. Ground water sampling began on 24 August 1999. Monitoring wells MW-1 through <br /> MW-6 were last monitored and sampled on 17 June 2002. The_domestic_ground water:wells were- <br /> -each-sampa during three-events. - <br /> The ground water flow direction has been inferred to be toward the northwest at an average gradient <br /> ' of 0.003 feet/feet. Figure 3 illustrates the June 2002 contoured ground water elevations. Ground <br /> water data is presented in Table 5. <br /> 1 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br /> 1 <br />