My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
201
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506554
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2020 11:16:16 AM
Creation date
3/5/2020 9:57:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0506554
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007499
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON SAVINGS BANK
STREET_NUMBER
201
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
21722609
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
201 N MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEDERAL BANK Fs.6 <br /> r - <br /> May 7, 1997 <br /> 1. 39 <br /> Mike Infurna <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 304 E. Weber Avenue, 3`d Floor <br /> Stockton, California 95202 <br /> Re: Invoice#035955, Account#0011724, Facility ID 007499 (Manteca Branch) <br /> Invoice#036172, Account#0011759, Facility ID 007504 (Stockton Corp.) <br /> Dear Mr. Infurna: <br /> We have received the above-referenced invoices and we would appreciate you clarifying a <br /> few items. The initial checks for$234 were submitted for the review of the work plan. <br /> We were under the assumption that this was the only fee required. However, the invoices <br /> reflect additional charges. We would like a clarification to the following: <br /> 1. Based on the initial fee of$234 along with the additional charges (Invoice#035955), it <br /> appears that we are being charged for 7.0 hours of review time. This amount of time <br /> to review the report appears excessive. <br /> 2. Based on the initial fee of$234 along with the additional charges (Invoice#036172), it <br /> appears that we are being charged for 8.1 hours of review time. This amount of time <br /> to review the report appears excessive. <br /> 3. Both invoices reflect a charge of$351.00 (3 hours) for you to conduct a field <br /> inspection. We now understand that you were required to conduct an inspection to <br /> make sure the wells were properly grouted. However, based on travel time from your <br /> office to each location, along with the actual time you were actually on-site, the 3.0 <br /> hour time charge for each property appears excessive. <br /> Our Environmental Consultants has recently submitted to you the actual investigation <br /> reports for these two properties. We recognize that it is a requirement that these reports <br /> be submitted to you. However, we are not requesting that you take any formal action at <br /> this time, and therefore, we are not anticipating any review fees associated with the <br /> reports. <br /> Again we would appreciate a written clarification to the above items. Please call me at <br /> (214) 360-2885 if you have any questions. <br /> AavidGehrklein <br /> Environmental Analyst <br /> € , 8333 Douglas Avenue Dallas, Texas 75225 214/360-3360 o N�� <br /> !4 . LE DER <br /> tiwM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.