Laserfiche WebLink
■ Choice 1 - Periodic AST inspections by the owner are necessary. Also, Formal <br />External Inspections by a certified inspector and leak tests by owner or owner's <br />designee are necessary at 5 year intervals. Lastly, Formal Internal Inspections by <br />certified inspector are necessary at 10 year intervals. <br />■ Choice l - Periodic AST inspections by the owner are necessary. Also, leak tests by <br />owner or owner's designee are necessary at 1 year intervals. Lastly, Formal External <br />Inspections by certified inspector are necessary at 5 year intervals. <br />Notice that two inspection alternatives or owner choices of types of inspections are given. <br />STI SP001 provides alternatives where warranted in an effort to equalize the risks <br />associated with each alternative. In this case, these two choices were given because <br />entering an AST poses significant risk to the inspector. Also, many shop -fabricated <br />ASTs do not have manways and therefore entry is difficult. Noted though is the fact that <br />Formal Internal Inspections provide more information about the condition of an AST than <br />Formal External Inspections combined with leak tests and therefore the former method is <br />provided with longer intervals between inspections than the latter. Hence, if we can <br />reduce the frequency of internal inspection while also maintaining equivalent protection, <br />we can reduce the risk of harm to human health and the environment. <br />To the owner of tanks, reduced inspections by the addition of safeguards is money in their pocket. <br />To the regulator, targeting inspections at the tanks that are installed without safeguards prevents <br />leaks. Implied in Table 5.5 in SPOO 1 is the encouragement for a tank owner to improve a tank <br />installation to reduce its risk to the environment. By applying generally accepted good industry <br />and engineering practices, such as those given for Category 1 tanks, the tank owner is rewarded <br />10 <br />