Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 1 <br /> 1 <br /> Joe Angulo <br /> ' From "Ron Chew" <Rchew@sequoialabs com> <br /> To <joe gti@sbcglobal net> <br /> Sent Friday,,January 23, 2004 5 59 PM <br /> Attach S312120 Revised zip, S312120 Revised pdf <br /> ' Subject Re Lab Reports- Omissions/QA problems Cardoza Site <br /> Hi Joe, <br /> ' Apologize for the oversight missing the EDBs The samples were analyzed for EDB, but not reported to <br /> you The revised reports attached <br /> ' The samples in the 2 projects that missed Holding Times were because we have instrument problem at <br /> the time these samples were analyzed The instrument for some unexplain reasons would stop running in <br /> ' the middle of analyzing samples Because of this some of your samples and other samples were <br /> analyzed past Holding Times This was unforseen, the problem has since been corrected <br /> ' Please feel free to contact me if you have further questions <br /> thanks <br /> ' rmc <br /> >>> "Joe Angulo" <Ioe gti@sbcglobal net> 01/23/04 04 19PM >>> <br /> Hi Ron, I am writing the report for the above Cardoza site work and discovered some problems with the <br /> data Sequioa emailed us <br /> ' Sequoia Report# 5312120- <br /> 1) Sixteen samples had "EDB" checked for analysis but the data reports do not contain any EDB data <br /> (The next report#S312195 had the EDB results correctly listed) <br /> 2) Sample CPT5D20- analyzed past holding time <br /> Sequoia Report#S312195- <br /> 1) Several samples analyzed past holding times <br /> CPT6D55 <br /> CPT8D30 <br /> ' CPT8D35 <br /> CPT8D55 <br /> tCould I get a response on these issues please9 Thanks Joe <br /> Because access to receiving equipment is not under our <br /> control, Sequoia Analytical cannot be responsible for the <br /> ' confidentiality of electronically transmitted data unless <br /> prior arrangements have been made <br /> 1 <br /> 1./26/2004 <br />