My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012557
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LODI
>
2500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545420
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012557
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2020 7:04:42 PM
Creation date
3/5/2020 5:03:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012557
RECORD_ID
PR0545420
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003815
FACILITY_NAME
TESORO (SPEEDWAY) 68154
STREET_NUMBER
2500
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LODI
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
02740006
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2500 W LODI AVE
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
k� <br /> Problem Assessment Report December 5, 19$9 <br /> USA Petroleum Station No. 65, Lodi, California AGS 87050-3 <br /> f <br /> receiving agency. Because initial contaminant levels are expected to exceed maxinwm levels <br /> set by the local wastewater treatment plant,direct discharge will probably be unacceptable. <br /> 13j�)reactor� <br /> This treatment alternative involves the creation of a growth environment conducive to <br /> specific strains of bacteria. These bacteria are selected for their ability to metabolize <br /> organic compounds (hydrocarbon constituents) into energy for cell maintenance and <br /> reproduction. Essentially, this process converts a soluble organic compound into an <br /> insoluble organic (cell protein) and less toxic material that can be physically removed from <br /> a water stream. The design and operation conditions for a system of this type are quite <br /> expensive using conventional activated sludge technology and may require contaminant <br /> concentrations greater than 50 ppm. As the concentrations of the contaminants needing <br /> treatment increase, the biological process becomes more economical. Unless higher levels <br /> # of contaminants appear in other wells, this method should not be considered. <br /> Waste Hauling and Offsite Disposal <br /> t The contaminated ground water can be removed from the site by hazardous waste hauling <br /> prior to treatment. This method is.not currently recommended because of the continued <br /> liability of the client for the disposal of a regulated substance and the cost involved for. <br /> J . onsite storage, transportation of the liquid, and waste disposal. <br /> I <br /> Cost EvEluation of Remedial Alternatives <br /> Preliminary cost estimates for possible mitigation programs are presented in Table 16. <br /> These estimates are based solely on our understanding of the sitc'and other broadly similar <br /> situations. -I'liey should not be construed as actual budgets or estimates of the costs for <br /> implementing the programs at this site. <br /> p8, g <br /> { <br /> S, <br /> 3 <br /> r <br /> `' r t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.