Laserfiche WebLink
c..w <br /> � v <br /> FStation <br /> 7 AGS 87A50-2 <br /> 65, Lodi, California <br /> for floating product, sheen, emulsion, and product odor. The <br /> results of the :subjective analyses are presented in Table 2. <br /> The wells were developed by air- and water-jetting and were <br /> purged by pumping until the discharge water was predominantly <br /> free of sediment. Approximately three well volutes of liquid <br /> were pumped per well.. The wells were purged to allow sampling of <br /> water representative of the formation. Purge water was directed <br /> into 55-gallon drums that were sealed and left at the site. <br /> These drums and the contained water remain the responsibility of <br /> 0 , USA Petroleum Company. Applied GeoSystems can arrange for the <br /> { properdisposal of the <br /> Purge water, if authorized by USA. <br /> ® The ground water was allowed to recover to static level in the <br /> three wells before sampling for laboratory analyses. Water <br /> I <br /> samples were collected with a Teflon bailer that had been washed <br /> 4 with Alconox and repeatedly rinsed with de-ionized water. The <br /> bailer was lowered through the air/water interface in each well <br /> to retrieve a sample of .the formation water. The samples were <br /> slowly transferred to laboratory-cleaned, 40-milliliter Volatile <br /> Organic Analysis glass sample vials_orto_-1 liter_glass-battles,-as appropriate for the method of analysis. Water samples for <br /> hydrocarbon analysis were made acidic by adding hydrochloric <br /> 12 <br /> A,av/led �eo.Systesns <br />