Laserfiche WebLink
i' <br /> j09 April 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Protect No 98-0497 <br /> 1 Page 2 of 6 <br />' 23 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS <br /> On 29 September 1999,two soil probe borings(P-1 and P-2)were advanced at the site as part of site <br /> assessment activities related to the two former USTs Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as <br /> gasoline(TPH-g) and diesel(TPH-d)were detected in soil samples collected from probe boring P-1 <br /> at maximum concentrations of 1,900 mg/kg and 10,000 mg/kg, respectively, laboratory review of <br /> t' the gasoline and diesel range chromatograms indicated that the sample chromatograms are more <br /> indicative of a diesel impact Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) were <br /> detected in soil samples collected from P-1, at maximum concentrations of 0 047 mg/kg benzene, <br /> 0 21 mg/kg toluene, 2 8 mg/kg ethylbenzene and 8 3 mg/kg xylenes The oxygenated ether methyl <br /> tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) was detected in soil samples collected from P-1 at concentrations <br /> ranging as high as 0 05 5 mg/kg No other target analytes were detected during the laboratory analysis <br /> tof selected soil samples <br /> On 14 and 15 August 2000,four soil borings(P-3,MW-1,MW-2,MW-3)were advanced at the site, <br /> borings MW-1 through MW-3 were completed as ground water monitoring wells Soil samples <br /> collected from the four borings did not contain detectable concentrations of TPH-g,but TPH-d was <br /> detected in soil samples P3-100 and MW1-75 at concentrations of 7 8 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg, <br /> ' . respectively Xylenes was detected in sample P3-75 (0 018 mg/kg) and MTBE was detected in <br /> sample MW 1-75 (0 025 mg/kg) No other target analytes were detected in the soil samples analyzed <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbon compounds were not detected in soil samples collected from soil borings <br /> MW-2 and MW-3,limiting the northern and southern extent of contaminated soil Table 1 contains <br /> analytical results of soil samples collected during soil boring advancment Figures 5 and 6 illustrate <br /> the inferred vertical and horizontal extent of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination at the site <br /> Quarterly monitoring of the ground water monitoring well network has been performed at the site <br /> since the third quarter 2000 TPH-g and TPH-d have been detected in monitoring well MW-1 at <br /> concentrations as high as 5,700 µg/1 and 120,000 gg/l, respectively Minor concentrations of <br /> ethylbenzene and xylene have been detected sporadically in samples collected from MWA No <br /> ' contaminates of concern have been detected in monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3 since monitoring <br /> began,limiting the northern and southern extent ofpetroleurn hydrocarbon contamination in ground <br /> water Table 3 contains analytical results from previous quarterly ground water monitoring events <br /> Figure 7 illustrates the inferred extent of hydrocarbon contamination in ground water at the site <br /> - 2 4 GROUND WATER DEPTH AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Depth to ground water was approximately 61 feet below surface grade(bsg)during during this phase <br /> ' of investigation Review of historical depth to ground water maps (San Joaquin County Flood <br /> i <br /> ' Advanced GeoEnvzronmental,Inc <br />�1 <br />