Laserfiche WebLink
' 29 April 2005 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 98-0497 <br /> ' Page 3 of 4 <br /> ' 3 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> The analytical results from the March 2005 ground water monitoring event are as follows <br /> ' • TPH-g was detected in well MW-1 at a concentration of 3,000 micrograms per liter(µg/1) <br /> The laboratory report noted that the detected concentration was mostly in the diesel range <br /> ' • TPH-d was detected in well MWA at a concentration of 84,000 µg/1 <br /> • BTEX compounds and MTBE were not detected in the five ground water samples analyzed <br /> Laboratory results of the submitted water samples are summarized in Table 2 The inferred areal <br /> extent of hydrocarbon-impacted ground water is illustrated on Figure 4 Copies of the laboratory <br /> report(CTEL Project No CT214-0503149),quality assurance/quality control(QA/QC)reports,and <br /> chain of custody form are provided in Appendix B <br /> i <br /> 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> i • The findings of the March 2005 ground water monitoring event include the following <br />' • Ground water elevations at the site averaged approximately 40 58 feet below MSL, <br /> indicating an average increase of 2 46 feet since the last monitoring event in November 2004 <br /> • Ground water was inferred to be flowing in a southeast-trending trough across the former <br /> UST area,under hydraulic gradients ranging from approximately 0 0006 ft/ft to 0 0013 ft/ft <br /> • TPH-g and TPH-d were detected in well MW-1 at concentrations of 3,000µg/l and <br />' 84,000 µg/l, respectively, however, the reported TPH-g concentrations were mostly in the <br /> TPH-d range <br /> i • Comparing the ground water sample results from this quarter and the previous quarter, the <br /> TPH-d concentrations detected in November 2004 (450,000 µg/l in MW-1 and 17,000 µg/1 <br /> in MW-4)were exceptionally high,possibly due to ground water having been at or near the <br />' lowest ever recorded at the site for two quarters(third and fourth) The results for the fourth <br /> quarter of 2004 appear to have been an anomaly <br /> • The hydrocarbon-impacted ground water plume appears to be limited to the former UST area <br /> immediately surrounding well MW-1- <br /> • <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> 1 <br />