Laserfiche WebLink
""tog"'Techxcaw Page 4 <br /> Groundwater Monitonng Report <br /> Project No 770 2 <br /> November 19,2003 <br /> r <br /> 18 at-0 007 and —0 012 ft/ft, respectively The MW-61106 well pair vertical gradients were <br /> negative (a downward direction) at—0 001, -0 001 and —0 002 ft/ft, respectively, on July 22, <br /> ' August 20 and September 18, 2003 <br /> Both positive and negative vertical gradients have been calculated for previous events <br /> ' Similar to the historical lateral directions, the direction of groundwater in the vertical plane <br /> also fluctuates at the site The magnitude of vertical groundwater flow direction ranged <br /> ' from—0 02 to 0 0097 for the site investigation <br /> 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> On July 22 and August 20, 2003, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support Services staff mobilized <br /> to the site to measure depth to groundwater in the site's monitoring wells <br /> On September 18, 2003, Don Light of Dei-Tech Geotechnical Support Services again <br /> mobilized to the site to complete the quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling of the <br /> site's monitoring wells Before sampling was attempted, the wells were sounded for depth <br /> to water and then a clear disposable bailer was used to determine if floating product was <br /> present No free product or sheen was noted in the site's wells for the event although sheen <br /> has been present in certain wells in the past The wells were purged of at least three well <br /> volumes of stagnant water using a dedicated Waterra check-ball assembly and '/2 inch <br /> tubing Purging continued until the temperature, conductivity and pH of the groundwater <br /> tstabilized (<10% variation among three readings) indicating that formation water <br /> representative of aquifer conditions was entering the wells These water quality parameters <br /> were measured at intervals of each well volume purged <br /> Once purging was complete, a water sample was collected from the Waterra tube Care was <br /> taken to minimize sample agitation Once the sample container was filled and capped, the <br /> bottle was inverted, tapped and checked for headspace bubbles The sample container was <br /> identified and labeled with a unique designation, inserted into foam holders and placed into <br /> ' an ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br /> All non-disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated using a hot water washer and <br /> ' detergent before and between uses Disposable gloves were used by the technician to <br /> collect all samples and were changed with each sample collection <br /> ' A chain of custody document, listing all samples collected, accompanied the samples from <br /> field to laboratory, thereby providing a means to track their movement and insure their <br /> integrity <br />