Laserfiche WebLink
gW10gkal Tech=$w Page 5 <br /> Groundwater Momtonng Report <br /> Project No 770 2 <br /> November 8,2004 <br /> ' was not processing Geo Well files on that date and the depth to groundwater data will be <br /> transmitted when the system is responding <br /> 2.0 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION <br /> ' The results of thegroundwater monitoring event indicate the following <br /> • The reversal of groundwater direction by 180°in the deeper aquifer for the April and May <br /> 2003 sounding events is anomalous to the historical data The deeper aquifer has been <br /> monitored by three wells (MW-104, MW-105 and MW-106) since June 2002 and the <br /> ' other events all displayed an easterly trend to groundwater direction It is noted that the <br /> gradients for these two events were higher than normal suggesting that off site production <br /> is influencing the aquifer A receptor well survey was completed for the site in January <br /> ' 2001 and two agricultural wells were identified approximately 1600 feet west of the site <br /> (see Map 1, Table 1 -- Appendix D) If these wells were operated during the months in <br /> question, it is possible that the Marci site was within the cone of depression created by <br /> the well pumping The shallow aquifer did not reverse during this period and this may be <br /> due to the domestic wells to the southeast of the site that may be screened shallower than <br /> the agricultural wells and exert a primary influence on the water table that is easterly <br /> • Diesel range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in seven of the site's eleven <br /> monitoring wells <br /> 0 Well MW-5 contained 99,000 µg/1 diesel and this represents a lump in one order of <br /> magnitude from the last event Well MW-5 remains the most severely impacted well <br /> o Well MW-4 also experienced a marked increase in diesel concentrations since the June <br /> 2004 event(from 496 to 5100 ug/1 TPH-D) <br />' • Gasoline range petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-G) were detected in MW-5 (240-µg/1) in <br /> this monitoring event Several wells have had at least one event in which TPH-G was <br />' detected <br /> • Trace BTEX constituents are present in wells MW-4 and MW-7 for this monitoring event <br /> • Deep wells MW-104 and MW-106 did not contain contaminant concentrations above the <br />' laboratory reporting limits TPH-diesel was detected (170 µg/1) in MW-105 <br /> • The groundwater samples were analyzed for 1,2-dichloroethane and 1,2-dibromoethane in <br /> _ accordance with SJC/EHD's _April _27, 2004. _ directive No well_ contained these <br />' contaminant concentrations above the laboratory reporting limit - 0 5 ug/l <br /> • The lateral extent of the diesel groundwater plume is currently undefined to the south and <br /> west <br /> • The vertical extent of the plume is intermittently defined by MW-104, 105, & 106. <br /> • Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) measurements show that several monitoring wells <br /> are within the reaction depleted water caused by biodegradation of the contamination <br /> plume All the monitoring wells exhibited low to moderately positive ORP values except <br /> MW-105 The ORP data are included in Table 5 of Appendix A <br />