Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> ' and soil sampling intervals are included in Appendix A. Drilling <br /> and well installation procedures are described in Appendix B; well <br /> construction data are summarized in Figures 4 , 5 , and 6. <br /> ' Well elevations were surveyed on April 30 , 1992 with a Nikon NT-2D <br /> Theodolite using an arbitrary datum of 100 . 00, from the top of well <br /> ' casing at MW-2 . A groundwater gradient was derived using water <br /> elevations observed on April 16, 1992 . The groundwater gradient is <br /> presented in Figure 3. <br /> 3.0 SITE LITHOLOGY AND FIELD OBSERVATIONS <br /> ' Subsurface soils encountered in the three well borings consisted of <br /> well graded gravel (typically fill material) from surface grade <br /> down to between 2. 5 feet and 4 feet. Below the fill material is a <br /> ' medium brown clayey silt with sparse roots and gravel which extends <br /> down to an approximate depth of 11 feet to 12 . 5 feet below surface <br /> grade. This material was medium stiff and damp. At and below the <br /> static water table the soil consisted of brown silty sand with <br /> ' sparse gravel ( in MW-1 and MW-3 ) and medium brown clayey silt with <br /> fine sand and sandy gravel (MW-2 ) . A medium brown clayey silt was <br /> observed at 16 to 17 feet below surface grade in MW-1 . <br /> Grab samples of the subsurface soil were obtained at approximately <br /> 2 feet below surface grade and at four foot intervals thereafter. <br /> No petroleum staining was observed nor was any odor detected. No <br /> organic vapors were recorded in any of the grab samples using the <br /> Foxboro Century 88 OVA. <br /> ' 4.0 SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> ' Subsurface soil samples were taken from each of the wells near the <br /> static water level, at an approximate depth of 12 feet below <br /> surface grade. These soil samples were collected with a "Modified <br /> California" drive sampler inserted with precleaned brass liners <br /> ' which were transported to a State Certified Laboratory for <br /> analysis. The results of the analysis are presented in Appendix C <br /> as MW-1/12 , MW-2/12, and MW-3/12 referring to samples taken from <br /> ' MW-1 , MW-2 , and MW-3 respectively. Soil sampling procedures are <br /> described in further detail in Appendix B. No petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as diesel or gasoline nor benzene, toluene, ethyl <br /> ' benzene, or total xylenes were detected in any of the soil samples. <br /> 5.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> ' Initial well development and measurement of the groundwater levels <br /> were performed by RMC Lonestar Environmental personnel on October <br /> 11 , 1991 . Groundwater samples were taken on November 21, 1991 by <br /> RMC Lonestar Environmental personnel and on April 16, 1992 by <br /> 2 <br />