Laserfiche WebLink
Corrective Action Plan <br /> 42 1 Groundwater Extraction <br /> Although aquifer pump testing has not been conducted at this site, the rate of water level recovery <br /> in monitoring wells, observed during monitoring well purging and sampling, has provided <br /> considerable understanding as to the water permeability of the shallow aquifer soil at the site <br /> Based on extensive experience at saes with similar soil characteristics and well recovery data, <br /> sustained recovery rates of 1 to 3 gallons of groundwater from each of the four groundwater <br /> extraction wells will effectively lower the groundwater table covering the entire impacted <br /> groundwater plume within the radius of influence of at least one extraction well OST is <br /> confident that an effective groundwater extraction system is feasible and that the system can be <br /> designed and implemented without further aquifer testing <br /> 4 2.2 Groundwater Extraction With Air Sparging <br /> Air sparging involves injecting air into the groundwater several feet below the water table to <br /> ienhance volatization of hydrocarbons and to maintain a fairly high level of dissolved oxygen <br /> This enhances the processes of naturally occurring bio-degradation Although conditions at this <br /> ' site are not ideal for effective air sparging,the process would probably be beneficial It is DST's <br /> opinion,however, that given the substantial uncertainties involving the air sparging process, the <br /> cost-effectiveness of its implementation is questionable OST believes that this process is not <br /> necessary or economically justifiable for effective groundwater(and soil) remediation <br /> 4 2 3 Passive Bio-Remediation for Groundwater (No Further Action) <br /> Because the groundwater at the site contains petroleum constituents exceeding the drinking water <br /> maximum contaminant levels by up to several thousand times and because the most severely <br /> impacted soil is beneath the groundwater table, passive bio-remediation is not considered an <br /> acceptable alternative and is, therefore, given no further consideration <br /> - <br /> � 0 PROPOSED REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY <br /> Based upon the facts and observations cited above, the co-extraction of groundwater and soil <br /> vapor is clearly the most cost-effective remediation solution at this site <br /> The relative volatile and bio-degradable constituents of gasoline are particularly amenable to the <br /> processes of SVE Although a soil vapor treatablily test has not been performed at the site, the <br /> soli logs indicate the size characteristics of the soil are well within the range for effective SVE <br /> OST has extensive experience implementing SVE at more than a dozen sites with soils having <br /> size characteristics similar or finer than the soil encountered at this site <br /> For SVE to be effective at this site however, the water table needs to be depressed to expose the <br /> 4� � P P <br /> most severely impacted soil horizon which presently lies, to a large extent, beneath the water <br /> OST <br /> 1 701-1 2 cap Page 9 <br />