SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE

Home Browse Search

Cc: William Little Subject: RE: 2224 Manthey Rd. - Geotracker documents Hi Gabriel, I just returned to the office after taking a few weeks off. As you can imagine, I am diving back in and tackling a mountain of work. Not to mention while I was gone, my upper management has assigned to work on other projects rest of week. Just to recap, the California Stop site started Ozone remediation in 06/21/13; based on a 10/29/13 EHD directive, all field work was suspended on 11/05/13. Due to the abrupt EHD directive to shut-down and some permitting/manufacturer issues, SVE was not conducted at the California Stop site during this time frame. From your below email, this is a large amount of time/work you are requesting as part of site closure proceedings. Based on the 09/26/2014 EHD letter, it would seem the EHD already submitted a case closure summary to RWQCB for concurrence some time ago. The 09/26/14 EHD letter states the EHD will issue a closure letter once (1) the 60 day public comment/participation has passed (ended 01/09/15), (2) certification that all record owners of feet title have been notified, (3) all wells have been destroyed and (4) waste manifest have been submitted to EHD. All of the above 4 tasks have been completed. A full report for ozone remed. does not appear to be pertinent at this point. Would a remed. update letter suffice that includes all laboratory reports/field sheets during the ozone remed. period. All remed. analytical will be uploaded to Geotracker. AGE never made recommendation to close this site; rather the site was abruptly directed by EHD to cease all field work and abandon all wells based on USTCF evaluation that the case warrants closure. In demonstrating how the site meets the LTCP,you are requesting AGE to submit another technical document. Haven't the EHD already demonstrated meeting the LTCP criteria in the case closure summary submitted to RWQCB. Is providing another technical document necessary? Residual contaminant mass estimates will be difficult to calculate since no verification monitoring was conducted after the EHD 10/29/13 directive to cease all field work. From the Public Notice fact sheet, AGE had previously calculated 6,500 pounds (1,040 gallons) of gasoline fuel had leaked to subsurface. Will be a crude estimate at best since no post ozone remed. monitoring was conducted at site. Full installation report for VW-4 seems to have little purpose. Would update letter/boring log suffice? I will submit boring log to geotracker ASAP. There was no analytical from install. Geo XY data for MW-9, -10, -11, VW-1, -2, -3, -4, OZ-1, OZ-2.These wells were not surveyed. But the wells have been destroyed, and therefore seems to have little purpose for closure proceedings to submit estimated Geo_XY data? I'm not sure how I would generate estimated Geo XY data, so is this necessary to close site? Thanks-Tim From: Gabriel Gonzalez [EH] [mailto:gagonzalez(asjcehd.com] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 2:35 PM To: Tim Cuellar Subject: 2224 Manthey Rd. - Geotracker documents Hi Tim, During review of the subject site's case, some items have not yet been addressed. To proceed with closing the case, please upload the following to Geotracker: