Laserfiche WebLink
Cc: William Little <br /> Subject: RE: 2224 Manthey Rd. - Geotracker documents <br /> Hi Gabriel, <br /> I just returned to the office after taking a few weeks off. As you can imagine, I am diving back in and tackling a <br /> mountain of work. Not to mention while I was gone, my upper management has assigned to work on other <br /> projects rest of week. <br /> Just to recap, the California Stop site started Ozone remediation in 06/21/13; based on a 10/29/13 EHD <br /> directive, all field work was suspended on 11/05/13. Due to the abrupt EHD directive to shut-down and some <br /> permitting/manufacturer issues, SVE was not conducted at the California Stop site during this time frame. <br /> From your below email, this is a large amount of time/work you are requesting as part of site closure <br /> proceedings. Based on the 09/26/2014 EHD letter, it would seem the EHD already submitted a case closure <br /> summary to RWQCB for concurrence some time ago. The 09/26/14 EHD letter states the EHD will issue a closure <br /> letter once (1) the 60 day public comment/participation has passed (ended 01/09/15), (2) certification that all <br /> record owners of feet title have been notified, (3) all wells have been destroyed and (4) waste manifest have <br /> been submitted to EHD. All of the above 4 tasks have been completed. <br /> A full report for ozone remed. does not appear to be pertinent at this point. Would a remed. update letter <br /> suffice that includes all laboratory reports/field sheets during the ozone remed. period. All remed. analytical will <br /> be uploaded to Geotracker. <br /> AGE never made recommendation to close this site; rather the site was abruptly directed by EHD to cease all <br /> field work and abandon all wells based on USTCF evaluation that the case warrants closure. In demonstrating <br /> how the site meets the LTCP, you are requesting AGE to submit another technical document. Haven't the EHD <br /> already demonstrated meeting the LTCP criteria in the case closure summary submitted to RWQCB. Is providing <br /> another technical document necessary? <br /> Residual contaminant mass estimates will be difficult to calculate since no verification monitoring was <br /> conducted after the EHD 10/29/13 directive to cease all field work. From the Public Notice fact sheet, AGE had <br /> previously calculated 6,500 pounds (1,040 gallons) of gasoline fuel had leaked to subsurface. Will be a crude <br /> estimate at best since no post ozone remed. monitoring was conducted at site. <br /> Full installation report for VW-4 seems to have little purpose. Would update letter/boring log suffice? I will <br /> submit boring log to geotracker ASAP. There was no analytical from install. <br /> Geo XY data for MW-9, -10, -11, VW-1, -2, -3, -4, OZ-1, OZ-2.These wells were not surveyed. But the wells have <br /> been destroyed, and therefore seems to have little purpose for closure proceedings to submit estimated Geo_XY <br /> data? I'm not sure how I would generate estimated Geo XY data, so is this necessary to close site? <br /> Thanks-Tim <br /> From: Gabriel Gonzalez [EH] fmailto:ga4onzalez@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 2:35 PM <br /> To: Tim Cuellar <br /> Subject: 2224 Manthey Rd. - Geotracker documents <br /> Hi Tim, <br /> 2 <br />