Laserfiche WebLink
27 October 2010 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 05-1256 <br /> Page 9 of 19 <br /> ground water, with an isolated distribution beneath the dispensers. <br /> Ground water depths have remained stable between approximately 18 feet and 22 feet bsg <br /> across the monitoring well network (Table 2; Appendix D). As a result, a minimal smear <br /> zone of soil contamination above and below the current water table has developed. <br /> Fluctuations in ground water depths across the site appear to be correlated to seasonal <br /> or annual ground water recharge (Appendix D). <br /> Fuel oxygenates and petroleum hydrocarbons within the saturated zone, in contact with <br /> ground water, includes a large area of minor MTBE and TPH-g concentrations providing <br /> for estimates of 43 pounds MTBE and 101 pounds TPH-g (Figures 5 and 6; Appendix C). <br /> The soil plumes appear to be narrow in shape, extending southeast, typical ground water <br /> flow direction, of the dispenser/source area. Ground water is likely moving through this <br /> mass,desorbing contaminants. Significant masses of dissolved MTBE and TPH-g, ranging <br /> between 75 to 266 pounds and 152 to 524 pounds, respectively,were calculated to remain <br /> within the water table (Figures 8 and 9; Appendix E). <br /> As discussed in Section 5.2., the magnitude ground water plumes shifted/migrated from <br /> wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-6 to wells MW-3, MW-7 and MW-8 between March 2008 and <br /> October 2008, and back to wells MW-1 , MW-2 and MW-6 in February 2009 (Table 3; <br /> Appendix D). The overall migration of the plumes appears to be east-southeast, <br /> down-gradient of the dispenser/source areas, beneath Interstate Highway 5 southbound <br /> on-ramp (Figures 8 and 9). <br /> 9.0. SOIL REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES <br /> A significant mass of contamination remains in soil beneath the dispenser area.To mitigate <br /> remaining contamination, AGE has evaluated two remedial technologies to treat <br /> contaminated vadose zone soil— ex-situ treatment (excavation) and soil vapor extraction <br /> (SVE). The feasibility, duration, and costs of each remedial method are discussed below. <br /> 9.1. EX-SITU TREATMENT OF IMPACTED SOIL <br /> Hydrocarbon-impacted soil can be minimally excavated and treated on-site or transported <br /> off-site for recycling/disposal. On-site treatment alternatives (ex-situ) include aeration, <br /> bioremediation, vapor extraction, and thermal destruction. All are feasible methods for <br /> above-ground remediation of soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Off-site <br /> disposal generally involves transportation of impacted soil to a licensed treatment/disposal <br /> facility. <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />