My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005185
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
4075
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545509
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2020 8:06:59 AM
Creation date
3/10/2020 3:44:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005185
RECORD_ID
PR0545509
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0002121
FACILITY_NAME
JAMAR SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
4075
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
15726411
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4075 E MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FIRST QUARTER, 2003 <br /> . GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT <br /> JAMAR OIL DISTRIBUTION <br /> JUNE 2083 <br /> The samples were placed into the appropriate laboratory prepared containers, using proper sample <br /> handling and chain-of-custody(COC) protocol established by the USEPA. The samples were <br /> labeled with the date, time, and identifying well number•, stored in a cooler at 4° Centigrade or <br /> less, and transported to a state certified laboratory under completed COC documentation_ <br /> Groundwater Analyses <br /> Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPH G and TPH D using EPA Method 8015 Modified <br /> and for BTEX, and the fuel oxygenates MTBE, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, and TBA using EPA <br /> Method 8260B. The analyses were conducted by SunStar Laboratories, Inc, of Tustin, California, <br /> a California State certified laboratory, in accordance with state guidelines and EPA protocol. <br /> Copies of the laboratory reports with COC documentation are included in Appendix B. The <br /> analytical data are summarized in Table 2 and shown on Figure 5. <br /> SUMMARY <br /> Groundwater Flow and Gradient <br /> • Based on depth to groundwater measurements taken on March 13, 2003, the depths to <br /> groundwater range from 63.00 feet below ground surface(bgs)in monitoring well MW-1 to <br /> 63.30 feet bgs in MW- 4. All groundwater elevations were measured to the nearest 0.01-foot <br /> relative to the surveyed top of casing elevation. The elevations are based on the survey <br /> conducted by)PCA on August 30, 2000. The survey on August 30, 2000 was completed by <br /> setting the corner of the cement sidewalk on the southeastern comer of the store as the <br /> benchmark with an assumed elevation of 30 feet above mean sea level (MSL). Based on the <br /> surveyed casing elevations and the measured depth to water on March 13, 2003, the groundwater <br /> elevations range from-34.38 feet in MW-5 to -34.79 feet in MW-4. <br /> The direction of groundwater flow has been calculated to be trending outh-southe with a <br /> relatively flat hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.004-feet/foot acros alculated <br /> groundwater elevations are summarized in Table 1, and shown on Figure 5. <br /> Groundwater Analytical Results <br /> TPH G was detected in samples from monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2,MW-3 and MW-4 this <br /> quarter at concentrations of 8,200 micrograms per liter(µg11), 1,100 µg/l, 880 µg/1 and 2,000 <br /> µg/l, respectively. TPH G was ND in MW-5. TPH D was detected in the sample from MW-1 at <br /> 620 µg/l and was ND in samples from the other wells. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.