My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004287
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
1804
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545493
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004287
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2020 7:02:51 AM
Creation date
3/11/2020 8:44:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0004287
RECORD_ID
PR0545493
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0009460
FACILITY_NAME
Stockton Center - EBMUD
STREET_NUMBER
1804
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14505027
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1804 W MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
..x.aeAe ccer..wcansunxre <br /> ROY F. WESTON, INC. <br /> STOCKTON ANALYTICAL, LABORATORY <br /> ANALYTICAL CASE NARRATIVE <br /> Client: WESTON ECON/EBMUD <br /> RFW#: 9207S268 <br /> Test: SW8015(MODIFIED)-TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS <br /> 1. This narrative covers the analysis of Sive (5j water samples in accordance with the <br /> protocols based on The California Luft Manual. <br /> 2. The analytical hold time for this analysis was met. <br /> 3. - Continuing calibration'criteria was met for this analysis. <br /> 4. The method blanks associated with this group of samples were free of target analyte <br /> interferences at, or above, the reporting limit. <br /> 5. Surrogate was not required for this analysis, but was added to help 8 q y p deterrrune purge <br /> efficiency. The surrogate concentration calculated in the blank was subtracted from <br /> all samples to yield the.final concentration. <br /> • F� <br /> 6. The blank spike recoveries were within acceptable Q.C. criteria. <br /> 7. Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries were within Laboratory Q.C. <br /> f limits. <br /> 8. The matrix spike relative percent differences were within Laboratory Q.C. limits. <br /> 4 <br /> 9. Retention times were within Q.C. tolerance limits. <br /> Al <br /> Unit Leader Date <br /> I �* <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.