Laserfiche WebLink
With regard to the quality control,samples, the analysis of MW-1 (the primary sample from <br /> monitoring well MW-1) and the blind duplicate (labeled MW-8) had comparable analytical <br /> results indicating very good repeatability of the laboratory analyses. Analytical results of the <br /> field decontamination sample, collected after sampling MW-1 (which was the first well sampled <br /> during the sampling event) indicated that there were low values of detectable BTEX constituents <br /> present in the field equipment after'completion of field decontamination procedures. However, <br /> as shown by the absence of petroleum hydrocarbon compounds in the samples taken from wells <br /> sampled after the field decontamination sample was collected, no cross-contamination of the <br /> other wells occurred. Therefore, the analytical results for this sampling event are considered <br /> to be representative of groundwater conditions at the site. Field decontamination procedures are <br /> being revised to improve cross coniamination protection for future monitoring events. <br /> 3.0 TIDAL INFLUENCE STUDY <br /> On July 8 and 9, 1992, WESTON collected field data to complete a tidal influence investigation 1 <br /> at the EBMUD facility. investigation ty This was performed to measure the effects on the 1 <br /> groundwater gradient beneath the :;site from tidal fluctuations in the Stockton Deep Water <br /> Channel which is located approximately 550 feet north of the site (Figure 1). <br /> Field work consisted of collecting;;nine complete rounds of groundwater levels from seven <br /> monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-7) over a twelve hour period (one complete tidal cycle). <br /> , <br /> Figure 2 depicts the monitoring well locations. The schedule of groundwater level measure- <br /> ments at EBMUD was chosen to correspond to high, low, and intermediate tidal stands in the I <br /> Stockton Channel as shown on Figure 3. The dates and times chosen for the tidal study were { <br /> also selected to correspond to one df the highest high tides of the summer. <br /> Each round of groundwater levels was collected within a 10 minute period in order to minimize <br /> F <br /> groundwater level fluctuations during the measurement process. Water levels were measured <br /> with an electronic well sounding device and recorded to the nearest 0.01 feet. Relative <br /> groundwater elevations were calculated and the results are presented in Table 3. From the <br /> results presented in Table 3, three groundwater surface maps were generated (Figures 4, 5, and <br /> 6) as well as a graph (Figure 7) showing fluctuations in groundwater elevations with time in the <br /> seven wells. <br /> {� 3.1 Tidal Study Results <br /> I L <br /> 1; During the twelve hour study period, the tide was receding for 5.25 hours and was rising for <br /> 6.35 hours. The results of the measurements show minor fluctuations in groundwater elevations <br /> in all seven wells. The maximum fluctuation in groundwater elevations ranged from 0.24 inches <br /> in MW-5 and MW-7 to 0.48 inches in MW-4. Although these groundwater level variations <br /> indicate the diurnal tides effect groundwater elevations at the site, the effect is minimal <br /> ' particularly when viewed in comparison to the channel tide variation of 4.0 feet observed during <br /> { the evaluation period. Of particular importance to the EBMUD site, the minimal tidal effect <br /> observed did not change the groundwater gradient direction as shown on Figures 4, 5 and 6. <br /> " "rSAMMUDRMW 4 US/27M <br /> 1 L <br />