My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MARCH
>
2701
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545517
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2020 3:12:05 AM
Creation date
3/11/2020 11:00:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0545517
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003798
FACILITY_NAME
MARCH LANE 76*
STREET_NUMBER
2701
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
MARCH
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95219
APN
11619007
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2701 W MARCH LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
v %.O� <br /> Stantec Consulting Corporation <br /> Adat 290 Conejo Ridge Avenue <br /> Thousand Oaks,CA 91361 <br /> Tel:(805)230-1266 <br /> Fax:(805)230-1277 <br /> Stantec ,P <br /> May 14, 2010 <br /> Stantec File No. 211302645 <br /> Mr. Michael Infurna <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> 600 East Main Street <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> Reference: Request for Low-Risk Case Closure <br /> Former 76 Service Station No. 5886 <br /> 2701 West March Lane <br /> Stockton, California <br /> SJCEHD Site Code: 1176 <br /> Dear Mr. Infurna: <br /> On behalf of ConocoPhillips Company, Stantec Consulting Corporation (Stantec) is requesting low- <br /> risk case closure for the above-referenced site (Figures 1 and 2). As is stated in a draft resolution <br /> prepared by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in response to SWRCB <br /> Resolution No. 2009-0042: <br /> "...a UST case should be closed not only where cleanup goals and objectives are <br /> currently met, but also where they will be met in a reasonable period. Further, what <br /> constitutes a reasonable period must be based on an analysis of all relevant factors <br /> including, but not limited to, where the residual contamination poses a threat to <br /> human helath or safety and is localized and unlikely to migrate beyond the current <br /> spatial extent, and if the affected groundwater will be used as a source of drinking <br /> water or other designated beneficial use in the timeframe required to meet cleanup <br /> goals and objectives"(a copy of this text is included as Attachment 1). <br /> Stantec feels the conditions at the above-referenced site meet these conditions. The bases for the <br /> request are the following: <br /> o The suspected source-zone hydrocarbon impacted soil has been excavated, and no soil <br /> samples collected since then (1996) have contained hydrocarbon concentrations which <br /> exceed their respective California Regional Water Quality Control Board — San Francisco <br /> Bay Region (CRWQCB-SFBR) final Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for either <br /> commercial or residential land use; <br /> o On-site groundwater impact appears to have been sufficiently remediated through the use of <br /> an ozone sparge system. Off-site groundwater impact appears limited to methyl tert-butyl <br /> ether (MTBE) observed in the vicinity of well cluster MW-9. As documented in Stantec's <br /> Results of Hydrogeologic Modeling, dated January 6, 2010 (included as Attachment 2), off- <br /> site MTBE impact is expected to attenuate over time, and not expected to significantly <br /> migrate down-gradient; <br /> o A review of historical groundwater analytical data indicate that other than MTBE <br /> concentrations detected in well MW-3 between first quarter 1999 and second quarter 2000 <br /> (at concentrations ranging from 31,000 micrograms per liter [Ng/L] to 122,000 pg/L), no <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.