My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MARCH
>
2701
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545517
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2020 3:12:05 AM
Creation date
3/11/2020 11:00:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0545517
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003798
FACILITY_NAME
MARCH LANE 76*
STREET_NUMBER
2701
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
MARCH
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95219
APN
11619007
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2701 W MARCH LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
II Stantec — Page 1 of 4 1 <br /> Mike Infurna EH V <br /> i <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 9:12 AM i <br /> To: 'Chevlen, Benjamin' <br /> Subject: RE:.76 Station�No. 5886 - Contact information for offsite property owner <br /> what's your schedule for completing/submitting the fate transport model? <br /> have you entertained the thought of including soil gas data from the MW-9 area in <br /> the model? <br /> do you have a schedule that includes a NFAR submittal soon? <br /> From: Chevlen, Benjamin [mailto:Benjamin.Chevlen@stantec.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 9:01 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 76 Station No. 5886 - Contact information for offsite property owner <br /> Mike -Sorry it took me a couple days to get back to you. Yes, the groundwater monitoring/sampling of the <br /> MW-9 well cluster is not an issue. As for soil gas sampling, if you are referring to soil vapor sampling in the <br /> vicinity of the MW-9 well cluster, an access agreement would still be required to stage both concrete <br /> cutting equipment and the direct push probe (assuming we don't encroach into West March Lane). <br /> i <br /> Benjamin Chevlen,P.G. <br /> Senior Geologist <br /> Stantec <br /> Ph:. (916)384-0745 <br /> Fx: (916)861-0430 <br /> Cell: (916)425-4849 <br /> benjamin.chevien@stantec.com <br /> stantec.com <br /> The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted,or <br /> used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient,please delete all <br /> copies and notify us immediately. _ <br /> Please consider the environment before printing this email: <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 2:09 PM <br /> To: Chevlen, Benjamin <br /> Subject: RE: 76 Station No. 5886 - Contact information for offsite property owner <br /> from what I read, l get the feeling just collectinggw samples from MW-9 (not <br /> with/using a vac truck, just a.tech and a bailer) is OK since this well complex is <br /> IN City property? <br /> and it is possible to actually do a soil vapor sample collection in the relatively <br /> SAME area w/o firing off cannons from Ms. Rishwain, assuming you get a <br /> permit from me and an encroachment permit from the City? <br /> 1/27/2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.