Laserfiche WebLink
Stantec Page 3 of 4 <br /> 1-Exactly what parcel is the MW-9 complex on.? get me the APN. The <br /> property we need access to is APN 118-020-05 <br /> 2- do you now have a signed access agreement for this well complex if it's <br /> NOT on Public/City land? NA <br /> 3- the name of the person denying access and when. Adrienne Rishwain <br /> indicating the property owners are not giving approval - email dated <br /> 9/5/08; hand written note received on 12-15-08; and hand-written noted <br /> received on 3/12/09. <br /> 4- is it conceivable that MW-11 may not have to be installed and only soil <br /> vapor issues in this area need to be addressed? Stantec is currently in <br /> the process of performing fate transport modeling for the remaining MTBE <br /> impact. Once completed, Stantec would be able to better determine if <br /> well installations (or at a minimum, grab-groundwater samples) should <br /> be completed in the vicinity of proposed well cluster MW-11 . <br /> get back to me with the info on MW-9 date of installation, our permit #, <br /> and exactly who's property it's on. If is truly is the City's, then there <br /> should be an open/existin Revocable Permit and bond on file with the City <br /> and copies in your file. Well cluster MW-9 was installed on 4/8/99 by <br /> Environmental Resources Inc. (ERI) under San Joaquin County (permit <br /> number illegible; copy attached) and City of Stockton Encroachment <br /> Permit No. 99-09. <br /> if there's a signed access agreement by a private entity for MW-9, then I <br /> need to see who signed it and what conditions for entry are listed. No <br /> and lastly, is this site qualified for NFA if the gw and soil/vapor data in <br /> MW-9 area is current and low/ND? I responded to this point in a <br /> separate email sent yesterday. <br /> Mr. Rishwan assured me he will put this concern on the front burner now <br /> that I have become involved. I need the confidence to support that valid, <br /> favorable data collected from the MW-9 area in the near future could <br /> support conclusions that this site is qualified for NFA and these few 'visits' <br /> will be close to the last times we will need to be using this well and <br /> accessing this area. <br /> From: Chevlen, Benjamin [mailto:Benjamin.Chevlen@stantec.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 2:32 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: 76 Station No. 5886 - Contact information for offsite property owner <br /> Mike -Thanks for getting back to me. The ftp link below contains copies of the original work <br /> plan proposing the installation of one set of nested wells and performing a hydrogen peroxide <br /> injection bench scale test, as well as a subsequent work plan proposing groundwater batch <br /> 1/27/2010 <br />