Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> v <br /> 0 <br /> • A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> In 1997 GHH Engineering removed three 12,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tanks <br /> (USTs), one 3,000-gallon diesel UST, and fuel pipelines The highest total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) concentration detected was 5,000 milligrams per kilogram <br /> (mg/kg) in the soil sample collected beneath the diesel fuel dispenser The highest TPHg <br /> concentration detected was 4,800 mg/kg in the soil sample collected beneath the gasoline USTs <br /> Benzene was detected at concentrations up to 4 2 and 6 4 mg/kg in the soil samples collected <br /> beneath the USTs and dispensers, respectively Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) was detected <br /> at concentrations up to 28 and 18 mg/kg in the soil samples collected beneath the USTs and <br /> dispensers, respectively Approximately 400 cubic yards of soil excavated during UST and <br /> associated pipeline removal was disposed of off-site at a licensed landfill GHH Engineering <br /> estimated the mass of residual gasoline at the site to be approximately 163 gallons per a Request <br /> for No Further Action report dated February 2000 <br /> GHH Engineering performed quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling from July 1997 to <br /> September 2002 The historic groundwater gradient direction has ranged from northeast to the <br /> southeast <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> Water level measurements were collected from wells MW-1P through MW-6P, MW-1 and MW- <br /> 2 on February 5, 2004 The locations of the monitoring wells are shown on Figures 2 and 3 <br /> Depth to water levels ranged from 62 77 to 63 77 feet below the tops of the well casings The <br /> groundwater elevation increased an average of 0 71 feet since the previous quarter The water <br /> level data were used to develop the groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 3) The average <br /> hydraulic gradient on February 5, 2004 was calculated to be 0 002 ft/ft or approximately 12 <br /> ft/mile, and flowed generally towards the southeast A summary of groundwater monitoring data <br /> is presented in Table 1 <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On February 5, 2004, ATC personnel collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells <br /> MW-1P through MW-6P, MW-1, and MW-2 Prior to collection of groundwater samples, the <br /> depth to water, pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature were measured in the groundwater <br /> purged from the monitoring wells and recorded Aquifer parameters were allowed to stabilize <br /> and a minimum of three well casing volumes were purged from each well prior to sampling, with <br /> the exception of MW-1 and MW-2 MW-1 and MW-2 were purged dry after evacuating <br /> approximately 15 well volumes The wells were allowed to recover and samples were collected <br /> from each well using dedicated disposable bailers Purged well water was contained on site in <br /> DOT approved 55-gallon drums and labeled for disposal pending receipt of laboratory results <br /> The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted to Argon Laboratories, a <br /> . state-certified analytical laboratory (ELAP cert no 2359) located in Ceres, California, for <br /> analyses Laboratory analyses consisted of TPHg utilizing EPA Method 8015, BTEX utilizing <br /> s Ienvironmenta112591210003-Stockton\QuartlyliQR-2004 doe 2 <br /> I <br />