Laserfiche WebLink
APPENDIX 6 ' <br /> LABORATORY ANALYSIS <br /> Andlyti—I parameters and techniques and wampla selection criteria <br /> �.icre {rucifeed by Shell 011 Company. All analyses were performed Uy <br /> I Cof•poraticn of Santa Clara, California, a California <br /> 4tate-certified laboratory approved by Shell Oil Company. Certified <br /> dnalyticel reports and descriptions of the analytical techniques are <br /> included in this Appendix. <br /> Based on the results of the field chemical analysis, one soil simple <br /> from each exploratory boring was analyzed for total hydrocarbons by <br /> EPA Method 413.2. The soil sample with the highest "-NU reading was <br /> selected for these analyses. Also one duplicate soil sample (a <br /> second ring) uas analyzed from one of the borings. In addition, a <br /> soil sample from one of the on-site tank fill boxes was collected and <br /> submitted for analysis. <br /> The water sample collected from the on-site well was analyzed for <br /> volatile organic Compounds by "cPA Method 602. Additional water <br /> samples were analyzed, including a sample of organic-free water which <br /> ,.las used to rinse the split-spoon sampler, a duplicate sample <br /> collected from the on-site well, a trip blank and a f. eld blank. A <br /> pump blank was not analyzed since there was only one on-site well. <br /> The trip blank reported on Table 1 , is presented in the Certified <br /> Analytical Report contained in PACIFIC's report for the USA service <br /> station located in Lodi, California, (PACIFIC project number <br /> 100-13.01 ). The Stockton and Lodi sites were sampled on the same <br /> day. <br /> 100-11.0! <br />