Laserfiche WebLink
ab .0- 0 Ir <br /> LOCATION: NP-2-22 Trends After System Upgrade <br /> 00 00 <br /> M <br /> COMPOUND i 9 COMPOUND z <br /> N <br /> ISD � <br /> ID <br /> Date (ug/1) WWI) Date Wall) Wall) <br /> December 2000 : 630 5.48 February 2002 . 220 0.25 <br /> February 2001 204 1.52 May 2002 340 6.8 <br /> a 2001 373 .19.5 August 2002 25 0.25 <br /> u ust 2001 100 1.8 NoVeMber 2002 25 0.25 <br /> ovem er 2001 130 0.25 February 2003 25 0.25 <br /> February 0 220 0.25 ay 3 25 0.25 <br /> May 2002 340 6.8u ust 2003 25 0.25 <br /> -August 2002 25 0.25 December 2003 25 0.25 <br /> ovem er 2002 25 0.25 Fe ruary 2 04 25 0.25 <br /> February 2003 25 0.25 April 2004 25 0.25 <br /> May 2003 25 0.25 Auqust2004 25 0.25 <br /> u ust 2003 25 0.25 November 2004 25 0.25 <br /> ecem er 2003 25 0.25 February 2005 25 0.25 <br /> Fe ruary 2004 25 0.25 STATISTICS <br /> April 2004 25 0.25 Anal sls 13 13 <br /> u ust 2004 25 0.25 S -21 -10 <br /> November 2004 25 0.25 Mann- 0.114 0.295 <br /> an <br /> ren es <br /> February 2005 25 0.25 Result at: 95% No Trend NA <br /> STATISTICS 9 No Trend NA <br /> nfiMqnce <br /> Analysis Count 18 18 S DownwardNA <br /> S -BO -59 CV 1.54 2.4 <br /> 1 Mann-Kendall P 0.001 0.013 <br /> Trend est esu t at: -Downward Downward <br /> 95%confidgirige Trend Trend <br /> 90%confidence Downward Downward <br /> Trend Trend <br /> 80%confidence Downward Downward <br /> Trend Trend <br /> 2 Sloe(units/yr) -1790 -34 <br /> CV 1.34 1 2.22 <br /> NOTES: 1) P is the probability (out of 1.0) of no significant trend(>3 analyses req'd) <br /> This value must be a 0.1 for a significant trend to exist at 90%confidence(Gilbert 1987) <br /> This value must be <0.2 for a significant trend to exist at 80%confidence (Gilbert 1987) <br /> Trend analysis not performd at locations where the majority of concentration values were non-df <br /> Non-detects entered as 112 the detection limit and italicized. <br /> NP-2-22 Table 3-4 & Appendix A mann-kendall <br />