Laserfiche WebLink
ENSR AECCM <br /> 3.0 Conceptual model and extent of contaminant impact <br /> The result of site investigation activities performed between the time of tank removal in 1992 and the <br /> completion of February 2005 quarterly groundwater monitoring activities were comprehensively reviewed to <br /> update the CSM. The following sections provide a detailed description of the updated CSM. <br /> 3.1 Geology and hydrogeology <br /> 3.1.1 Geology <br /> The site is located in the San Joaquin River Basin within the Central Valley of California, a northwestward- <br /> trending trough between the Sierra Nevada and Coast Ranges. The sedimentary sequence is alluvium, which <br /> has a maximum thickness of 9,000 feet in the vicinity of the site. The surficial geology at the site is comprised <br /> ' principally of floodplain deposits from the San Joaquin River. <br /> Soil observed beneath the site are comprised primarily of silt and clay to-approximately 20 feet bgs, below <br /> which interbedded silt, clay, and sand extend to approximately 75 feet bgs; silt and clay again predominate <br /> between approximately 75 and 110 feet bgs, below which interbedded sand and silt were observed. Three <br /> zones of higher sand content have previously been identified between approximately 35 and 50 feet bgs, 60 <br /> and 75 feet bgs, and below 115 feet bgs, identified as Zone A, Zone B and Zone C, respectively. However, in <br /> some cases, these may be merely distinctions of convenience, as there is no contiguous low-permeability unit <br /> between Zones A and B. The depth and thickness of these zones are highly variable across the site, <br /> consistent with the alluvial depositional history of the region. Geologic cross-sections depicting subsurface <br /> stratigraphy with descriptions of soils encountered on and off site are illustrated in Figures 3-1 through 3-3. <br /> 3.1.2 Hydrogeology <br /> The depth to groundwater at the site has historically ranged from 25 to 48 feet bgs. Groundwater depths were <br /> at their recorded maximum (i.e., approximately 48 feet bgs) in 1994, when monitoring wells were first installed. <br /> Groundwater elevation then rose to approximately 25 feet bgs in 1999, 2000 and 2001, and have declined to <br /> their current depth of approximately 30 feet bgs. Interpreted potentiometric contour maps based on February <br /> 2005 data are presented for Zones A, B and C in Figures 3-4 through 3-6. The groundwater flow direction in <br /> all three zones is generally to the east, away from the San Juaquin River with a hydraulic gradient ranging <br /> from 0.004 to 0.007 feet per foot. <br /> The vertical to component the hydraulic p e y raullc gradient is consistently downward at the site. Poten#iometric surface <br /> monitoring data at multi-depth well clusters are presented in Table 3-1. These data indicate that the downward <br /> component to the hydraulic gradient between Zone A and Zone B is comparable to the horizontal, and is <br /> greater than the horizontal gradient between Zone B and Zone C, indicating that the primary direction of <br /> groundwater migration is downward between these units. <br /> iThe nearest water supply well to the site is a public supply well located approximately 1,600 feet east- <br /> northeast(downgradient)of the site. For public security reasons, information is not currently available for this <br /> well. However, based on information for other supply wells in the area, it is understood to be screened at a <br /> depth of approximately 300 and 400 feet bgs. No aquitard has been observed between Zone C and the <br /> estimated screened interval of the downgradient water supply well. However, given the depth of the regional <br /> productive interval and the predominance of clay deposits in the overlying stratigraphic units, it is believed that <br /> there is no strong connection between Zone C and the aquifer from which local water supply wells withdraw <br /> their water. <br /> i <br /> J:tiRem_Eng\Project Files1P60(6000- <br /> 6999)16940-UNOCAL Portfolio Clasure16940. 3-1 January 2006 <br /> UNOCAL Portfolio Closure\Site 0187-Stockton <br /> East Min0ACSM ReportlCSM Report_Final.dac <br /> i <br />