My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012141
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MINER
>
437
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0541875
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012141
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2020 4:57:02 PM
Creation date
3/16/2020 2:57:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012141
RECORD_ID
PR0541875
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024017
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON SITE 306415
STREET_NUMBER
437
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MINER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
1392417
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
437 E MINER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
q1 <br /> Work Plan for Additional Subsurface Assessment and Feasibility Study—Former Unocal Station#0187 <br /> September 14,2000 <br /> ADVANTAGES <br /> 1) Low annual cost <br /> DISADVANTAGES <br /> 1) Potential liability <br /> 2) No defined protect completion/closure <br /> 3) Potential migration of contamination <br /> CONCLUSION Not a suitable approach for this site at this time <br /> OPTION#2 -GROUNDWATER PUMP AND TREAT <br /> No aquifer tests have been completed at the site Much of the groundwater occurs within silt and clay <br /> zones of relatively low permeability However, the two mayor sand horizons may have relatively high <br /> permeability <br /> COST Medium to high <br /> TIME FRAME Long term <br /> ADVANTAGES <br /> 1) Potential for hydraulic control <br /> DISADVANTAGES <br /> 1) Extracted contaminants must be disposed of separately <br /> 2) Not cost-effective or productive for zones of relatively low permeability. <br /> 3) May not clean up the source of the contamination <br /> CONCLUSION Not effective remedial method for this site, more feasible methods are available <br /> OPTION 43—AIR SPARGEIVAPOR EXTRACTION <br /> Air sparging is an in situ remedial technology that reduces concentrations of volatile constituents in <br /> petroleum products that are adsorbed to soils and dissolved in groundwater This technology, which is <br /> also known as "in situ air stripping" and "in situ volatilization," involves the infection of contaminant-free <br /> air into the subsurface saturated zone, enabling a phase transfer of hydrocarbons from a dissolved state to <br /> a vapor phase The air is then vented through the unsaturated zone Air sparging is most often used <br /> together with soil vapor extraction(SVE), but it can also be used with other remedial technologies When <br /> air sparging is combined with SVE, the SVE system creates a negative pressure in the unsaturated zone <br /> through a series of extraction wells to control the vapor plume migration <br /> COST Moderate to high <br /> T1ME FRAME Long term due to low hydrocarbon extraction rate <br /> 240042 08 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.