Laserfiche WebLink
' 10 June 1999 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No. 95-0185 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> transferred into two 40-m1 volatile organic analysis(VOA)vials containing 0.5ml 18%hydrochloric <br /> ' acid as a sample preservative and into one 1-liter amber bottle without preservative. After collection, <br /> the samples were placed in a chilled container and transported under chain-of-custody to <br /> McCampbell Analytical, Inc. (MAI). Each sample was analyzed in accordance with the following: <br /> • EPA Method 8015 Modified for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and as <br /> diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d), <br /> • EPA Method 8020 for volatile aromatic compounds (benzene, toluene, ethyl-benzene and <br /> 1total xylenes: BTEX) and <br /> • EPA Method 8260 Modified for oxygenated fuel additives di-isopropyl ether(DIPE), ethyl <br /> tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE), tertiary amyl methyl ether <br /> ' (TAME) and tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA). <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> 1• Ground water relative elevations were determined from field data, and the concentrations of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons were determined by laboratory analysis by an independent DHS-certified <br /> analytical laboratory. <br /> r <br /> 3.1. GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> The relative elevation of ground water in each well was calculated by subtracting the ground water <br /> depth from the surveyed casing elevation. Monitoring well casing elevations were surveyed relative <br /> to well MW-4, which was assigned an arbitrary elevation of 60 feet. During the March 1999 <br /> sampling event,the depth to ground water below the tops of the well casings at the site ranged from <br /> 17.45 feet to 18.10 feet. <br /> The screen interval of the monitoring wells were appropriate to obtain representative samples of the <br /> upper most ground water. The average ground water elevations have relatively remained the same <br /> since the last quarterly monitoring event in December 1998. Using the relative ground water <br /> q Y <br /> elevation measurements,the ground water gradient was calculated to be 0.006 for 25 March 1999, <br /> directed radically toward the'west from well MW=4 (former UST location);with the flow'direction <br /> varying from the Northwest to the Southwest. <br /> 3 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmentai,Inc. <br />{ <br />