Laserfiche WebLink
22 November 1996 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0185 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br />' form are included in Appendix B. <br />' 4.0. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> I <br /> i <br /> 4.1. CONCLUSIONS <br /> The following conclusions were drawn from the results of this investigation: <br />' TPH and several BTE&X compounds were detected this quarter in samples collected from <br /> three of the four ground water monitoring wells. <br />' MTBE was not detected in the water samples collected from the monitoring wells this <br /> quarter. <br /> • Well MW-2 appears to be beyond the southern edge of the dissolved hydrocarbon plume and <br />' the location of monitoring well MW-3 appears to be near the western boundary of the <br /> hydrocarbon plume. <br /> • The northern and eastern margins of the ground water plume have not been delineated. <br /> • AGE anticipates that additional investigation north and east of the site will be required to <br /> determine the lateral extent of impacted soil and ground water. <br /> 4.2: RECOMMENDATIONS <br />' Based on the results of this investigation, AGE recommends the following: <br /> • For the delineation of the dissolved hydrocarbon plume, we recommend the collection of <br />' a minimum of four to five grab ground water samples. The samples should be collected to <br /> both delineate the hydrocarbon plume and provide information for the most effective <br /> placement of future ground water monitoring wells. AGE will provide a site specific work <br />' plan addendum for the additional well installation, upon the request of the PHS-EHD. <br /> • Based on the current data the most likely placement of additional wells are as follows: one <br /> well should be installed north of MW-3; a second well should be installed northeast of MW- <br /> T along-Wilma Avenue and the third well should be installed on the east side of the Highway <br /> 99 ramp. <br /> • The next quarterly monitoring should be scheduled for December 1996. <br />