Laserfiche WebLink
ll August 2004 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 98-0432 <br /> ' Page 2 of 4 <br /> ' Temperature, pH and conductivity of the purged water were measured at regular purge-volume <br /> Intervals with an Oakton water analyzer Monitoring well field logs are Included in Appendix A <br /> Purge water generated from the site monitoring wells was contained on-site in appropriately labeled <br /> ' 55-gallon drums <br /> ' 22 COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Ground water samples were collected from the monitoring wells using the disposable polyethylene <br /> ' bailers, these bailers are disposed of after one use and require no decontaminating, thereby <br /> minimizing cross-contamination from sampling devices Each water sample was transferred Into <br /> three 40-m1 EPA-approved volatile organic analysis(VOA) vials containing 0 5-ml 18% HCl as a <br /> sample preservative and Into one 1-liter amber bottle without preservative After collection, the <br /> samples were labeled and placed In a chilled container for transportation under chain of custody to <br /> ' Cal Tech Environmental Laboratory(CTEL), a California Department of Health Services (DHS)- <br /> certified analytical laboratory located in Paramount, California Each sample was analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d) in <br /> accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified, <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) and fuel additive compounds, <br /> ' Including di-Isopropyl ether(DIPE),ethyl-tertiary-butyl ether(ETBE),methyl-tertiary-butyl <br /> ether (MTBE), tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME), tertiary-butanol (TBA), 1,2- <br /> dichloroethane(1,2-DCA)and 1,2-dibromoethane(EDB),In accordance with EPA Method <br /> ' 8260B <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> ' Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were detennined from field data collected In <br /> July 2004, the contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by the ground water sample <br /> laboratory analytical data <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION, FLOW DIRECTION AND GRADIENT <br />' The - <br /> depth to ground water measured In the monitoring wells ranged from 19 22 to 20 70 feet below <br />' the top of the well casing (btoc) (Table 1) The ground water elevations at the site ranged from <br /> 17 00 feet (MW-8) to 17 51 feet (MW-6) above mean sea level (MSL), the average ground water <br /> • elevation decreased 2 feet since the previous monitoring event in February 2004 <br />' Advanced GeoEnviroumental,Inc <br />