Laserfiche WebLink
' 17 October 2003 <br /> . AGE-NC Project No 98-0432 <br /> ' Page 2 of 4 <br /> ' Temperature, pH and conductivity of the purged water were measured at regular purge-volume <br /> intervals with an Oakton water analyzer Monitoring well field logs are Included In Appendix A <br /> Purge water generated from the site monitoring wells was contained on-site In appropriately labeled <br /> ' 55-gallon drums <br /> r <br /> ' 22 COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Ground water samples were collected from the monitoring wells using the disposable polyethylene <br /> ' bailers, these bailers were disposed of after one use and require no decontaminating, thereby <br /> minimizing cross contamination due to sampling devices Each water sample was transferred into <br /> three 40-ml EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18%HCl as a sample preservative and Into <br /> ' one 1-liter amber bottle without preservative After collection,the samples were labeled and placed <br /> In a chilled container for transportation under chain-of-custody to Cal Tech Environmental <br /> Laboratory (CTEL) , a California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified analytical <br /> ' laboratory located In Paramount, California Each sample was analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d) In <br /> ' • accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified, <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) and Fuel additive compounds, <br /> Including dl-Isopropyl ether(DIPE),ethyl-tertiary-butyl ether(ETBE),methyl-tertiary-butyl <br /> ether (MTBE), tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME), and tertiary-butanol (TBA), 1,2- <br /> dlchloroethane (1,2-DCA), ethyl dlbromide (EDB) and 1,2-dlbromoethane, in accordance <br /> 1 with EPA Method 8260B <br /> ' 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> ' Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected in <br /> July 2003, the contaminant Impact to ground water was quantified by the ground water sample <br /> laboratory analytical data <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION, FLOW DIRECTION AND GRADIENT <br /> The depth to ground water measured In the monitoring wells ranged from 15 oto 16 66 feet below <br /> the top of the well casing (btoc) (Table 1) The ground water elevations at the site ranged from <br /> 20 90 feet (MW-8) to 21 64 feet (MW-6) above mean sea level (MSL), the average ground water <br /> elevation Increased 1 foot since the previous monitoring event In December 2002 <br /> . The ground water flow direction was Inferred to be towards the north,at a gradient of approximately <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />